I want to setup an ActiveMQ cluster. As I encountered problems with shared nothing approach, I'd like to do it using shared filesystem. However, the ActiveMQ documentation warns about possible problems related to filesystem locks. As I'm not sure, I'd like to ask, if GlusterFS would be a good choice for shared filesystem.
相关问题
- ActiveMQ: Get list of connections through JMX?
- Using parameters from BASH file name as arguments
- Unable to start application on websphere 8.5, but
- Batch consuming of JMS messages
- How best to file lock in Java cluster
相关文章
- Stacktrace does not print in Glassfish 4.1 Cluster
- Connecting Unity3d Android application to ActiveMQ
- ActiveMQ - is it possible to acknowledge single me
- ActiveMQ: starting consumer without broker
- How to get all enqueued messages in ActiveMQ?
- Compute dissimilarity matrix for large data
- Connection to Redis cluster failed
- Does Apache Mesos recognize GPU cores?
Shared-storage master-slave requires that the underlying file system supports network file locks. GlusterFS seems to support network locks going by the documentation (it's not 100% clear). Ultimately the best way to find out is to set it up and check.
If it doesn't you still have the option of falling back to a shared JDBC-based store.