Hi I am trying to query a block by with these piece of code by importing ledger package which is part of QSCC but there are some errors when try to invoke please clarify whether this is correct way of doing it.
func (t *SimpleChaincode) expt(stub shim.ChaincodeStubInterface, args []string) pb.Response{
var plp ledger.PeerLedgerProvider
var pl ledger.PeerLedger
lId,err:=plp.List()
if err != nil {
return shim.Error("Invalid transaction amount, expecting a integer value")
}
fmt.Println(" List lists the ids of the existing ledgers")
fmt.Println(lId)
yesNO,err:=plp.Exists(lId[0])
if err != nil {
return shim.Error("Invalid transaction amount, expecting a integer value")
}
fmt.Println(" tells whether the ledger with given id exists")
fmt.Println(yesNO)
txid:=args[0]
tx,err:=pl.GetTransactionByID(txid)
if err != nil {
return shim.Error("Invalid transaction amount, expecting a integer value")
}
fmt.Println("transaction")
fmt.Println(tx)
return shim.Success(nil)
}
Errors is
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x38 pc=0x40301b]
goroutine 7 [running]:
panic(0x9eb1a0, 0xc420016040)
/opt/go/src/runtime/panic.go:500 +0x1a1
main.(*SimpleChaincode).expt(0xfaa000, 0xf71120, 0xc42016ae80, 0xc4202faad0, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, ...)
/chaincode/input/src/github.com/example_cc/example_cc.go:191 +0x5b
main.(*SimpleChaincode).Invoke(0xfaa000, 0xf71120, 0xc42016ae80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
/chaincode/input/src/github.com/example_cc/example_cc.go:98 +0x430
github.com/hyperledger/fabric/core/chaincode/shim.(*Handler).handleTransaction.func1(0xc4202389a0, 0xc4200119a0)
/opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/core/chaincode/shim/handler.go:317 +0x483
created by github.com/hyperledger/fabric/core/chaincode/shim.(*Handler).handleTransaction
/opt/gopath/src/github.com/hyperledger/fabric/core/chaincode/shim/handler.go:328 +0x49
First of all to start with, you are not suppose to interact directly with a ledger structure from your chaincode, but rather to leverage existing APIs of
ChaincodeStubInterface
provided forInvoke
andInit
methods of chaincode.Now, about the logic you are trying to achieve, one of the possible solutions would be to make use of
CreateCompositeKey
in the following way:Of course this is only an example and a lot of details missed, but the key idea is to leverage APIs available throughout the
ChaincodeStubInterface
rather than trying to access ledger directly from the chaincode by executing system chaincodes.