Basically in the assembly language of 68000 to postincrement an address register you have to do:
(A0)+
Example
MOVE (A0)+,D0
This will move into D0
the value pointed by address of A0
and also will increment A0
by 1.
Considering that (A0)
is the value pointed by A0
wasn't better if the postincrement syntax was:
(A0+)
? Or I am missing something?
I think that current postincrement syntax points at this feature, while
(A1+)
more suggests that A1 incremens by one always.Look at: Indirect addressing with postincrement