I am migrating to Play 2.6 and have the following API wrapper functions that used to work:
trait API {
self: Controller =>
def api(businessLogic: Request[AnyContent] => Any): Action[AnyContent] = apiWithBody(parse.anyContent)(businessLogic)
def apiWithBody[A](bodyParser: BodyParser[A])(businessLogic: Request[A] => Any): Action[A] = Action(bodyParser) {
implicit request =>
{
val apiResult = businessLogic(request)
val start = new java.util.Date().getTime
val actionDuration = (new java.util.Date().getTime - start)
val response = resultFrom(apiResult, request, actionDuration) // Returns a Result
response
}
}
}
Called by Controller functions like:
object Accounts extends Controller with API {
def all = superUser {
implicit principal =>
api {
request =>
models.Account.all
}
}
}
Where superUser is the principal (user) type "admin".
And get the following compiler error:
[error] type mismatch;
[error] found : play.api.mvc.Action[play.api.mvc.AnyContent]
[error] required: play.api.mvc.Request[?] => play.api.mvc.Result
[error] api {
[error] ^
I'm building with sbt 1.1.5 and Scala 2.11.8.
I am guessing the [?] means the compiler doesn't know what type is required but I don't understand what is wrong. I have searched for this issue but not found the specific answer for this problem.
In addition I'm getting an error:
[error] could not find implicit value for parameter parser: play.api.mvc.BodyParser[Any]
[error] def all = superUser {
[error] ^
that I posted as a separate issue (see could not find implicit value for parameter parser: play.api.mvc.BodyParser[Any]) but might be relevant here?
def superUser[A](f: => Principal => Request[A] => Result)(implicit parser: BodyParser[A]): SecureAction[A] = {
_superUser {
user =>
implicit val principal = data.Principal(user)
Action(parser)(request => f(principal)(request))
}
}
private def _superUser[A](action: String => Action[A]) = {
play.api.mvc.Security.Authenticated(getSuperUser, onUnauthorized)(action)
}
Any help would be appreciated.
Sorry I'm little bit confused here about the architecture as:
Future
API for it? Because then you canrecover
it. Which then help you with logging and error handling.all
method get the request, and then it does not return an HTTP response. Why don't you pass on what you need from the request (e.g., theCookie
).I think the answer to your question is to use your action composition with action. Something like: