I am trying to read some text from a file and write it to another using open()
, read()
and write()
.
This is my open()
for the file-to-write-to (I want to create a new file and write into it):
fOut = open ("test-1", O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_SYNC);
This is setting file-permissions to something I don't understand at all. This is the output of ls -l
:
---------T 1 chaitanya chaitanya 0 2010-02-11 09:38 test-1
Even the read permission is locked. I tried searching for this, but could not find ANYTHING.
Strangely, write()
still successfully writes data to the file.
Also, if I do a 'chmod 777 test-1', things start working properly again.
Could someone please let me know where I am going wrong in my open call?
Thanks!
For your reference, I have pasted the complete program below:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
int main () {
char buffer[512], ch;
int fIn, fOut, i;
ssize_t bytes;
FILE *fp = NULL;
//open a file
fIn = open ("test", O_RDONLY);
if (fIn == -1) {
printf("\nfailed to open file.");
return 1;
}
//read from file
bytes = read (fIn, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
//and close it
close (fIn);
printf("\nSuccessfully read %d bytes.\n", bytes);
//Create a new file
fOut = open ("test-1", O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_SYNC);
printf("\nThese are the permissions for test-1\n");
fflush(stdout);
system("ls -l test-1");
//write to it and close it.
write (fOut, buffer, bytes);
close (fOut);
//write is somehow locking even the read permission to the file. Change it.
system("chmod 777 test-1");
fp = fopen ("test-1", "r");
if (fp == NULL) {
printf("\nCan't open test-1");
return 1;
}
while (1)
{
ch = fgetc(fp);
if (ch == EOF)
break;
printf("\n%c", ch);
}
fclose (fp);
return 0;
}
This is kind of an old thread, but I think people should be aware of the "sys/stat.h" library. This includes a bunch of symbolic constants for setting permission bits.
For example: To open a file with Read/Write permissions enabled for the user
where:
This library includes a bunch of others, I won't list them all here but you can read up on it all here.
Of course you can put in the octal values to set these bits, however some may argue that it is poor coding practice.
Reading http://linux.die.net/man/2/open it seems you missed the
mode
parameter for open:open() takes a third argument which is the set of permissions, i.e.
0666 is an octal number, i.e. every one of the 6's corresponds to three permission bits
6 = rw
7 = rwx
It's a typical pitfall. The compiler allows you to leave the permission argument away, because when you open an existing file the permission bits don't make sense. But when you forget the argument when you create a file, you get a random set of permissions, e.g. 0000 in your case (---).
you can call
umask(0);
system call before usingopen();
system call to set your choices permissions to file correctly.This question recently helped me out, so I wanted to do my part to add a bit more depth as to what's going on. Like it was stated before, you were missing the third argument to
open()
. However, the permissions you see aren't random; they're coming from the stack. Look at the following code snippet:Note the following result:
Let's change the first push to 1, i.e. execute permission:
and we get:
Change the push to 4, i.e. read permission, and mess with the other two values:
and we get:
Thus we can see the third value popped off the stack (first pushed) is what really matters. Finally for fun we can try 5 and then 50, which respectively result in:
Hope this adds some clarity!
Actually
umask()
only filters permissions and does not set them. The typicalumask()
value is0002
("don't give away write permission to the world") and if your mode value in theopen( "file", O_CREAT, 0777)
gave all permissions, the resulting file would have775
as its permssions.