For example:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
from PySide import QtCore, QtGui
class Dialog(QtGui.QDialog):
def __init__(self):
QtGui.QDialog.__init__(self)
button = QtGui.QPushButton("test")
layout = QtGui.QVBoxLayout()
layout.addWidget(button)
self.setLayout(layout)
app = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv)
toast = Dialog()
toast.show()
app.exec_()
print("App freezes the main process!")
The last print() function will not be executed until you close the dialog.
I am working on a script that only uses qt for displaying some content that does not require user interaction, so I would prefer the gui code runs in background.
I'm not sure if the PySide imposes any restrictions, but here's how it's done in C++:
Yes, the Qt documentation currently says that only the main thread is allowed. However, there is nothing in the Qt source code that forbids creating QApplication in a secondary thread and then using GUI classes in that thread (for Windows and Linux). The documentation should be changed.
Mac OS X is different though -- the Cocoa framework only allows GUI operations in the main thread.
This is not possible. Qt documentation states:
(emphasis mine)
This answer suggests on the other hand that in reality this is not true :) However it seems that PySide sticks to the official version:
This can be verified by the following code sample:
which produces the following output:
(and a crash, on my machine). I have also verified the option with creating the
app
within the other thread - it works, but crashes on exit.So the solution seems to let Qt have the main thread, and organize your processing in a separate thread. This shouldn't really be a problem: if you'll separate your concerns well it won't make a difference for your console-app part on which thread it's running.