I am trying to write a wrapper script for a command line program (svnadmin verify) that will display a nice progress indicator for the operation. This requires me to be able to see each line of output from the wrapped program as soon as it is output.
I figured that I'd just execute the program using subprocess.Popen
, use stdout=PIPE
, then read each line as it came in and act on it accordingly. However, when I ran the following code, the output appeared to be buffered somewhere, causing it to appear in two chunks, lines 1 through 332, then 333 through 439 (the last line of output)
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE, STDOUT
p = Popen('svnadmin verify /var/svn/repos/config', stdout = PIPE,
stderr = STDOUT, shell = True)
for line in p.stdout:
print line.replace('\n', '')
After looking at the documentation on subprocess a little, I discovered the bufsize
parameter to Popen
, so I tried setting bufsize to 1 (buffer each line) and 0 (no buffer), but neither value seemed to change the way the lines were being delivered.
At this point I was starting to grasp for straws, so I wrote the following output loop:
while True:
try:
print p.stdout.next().replace('\n', '')
except StopIteration:
break
but got the same result.
Is it possible to get 'realtime' program output of a program executed using subprocess? Is there some other option in Python that is forward-compatible (not exec*
)?
You can try this:
If you use readline instead of read, there will be some cases where the input message is not printed. Try it with a command the requires an inline input and see for yourself.
Real Time Output Issue resolved: I did encountered similar issue in Python, while capturing the real time output from c program. I added "fflush(stdout);" in my C code. It worked for me. Here is the snip the code
<< C Program >>
<< Python Program >>
<< OUTPUT>> Print: Count 1 Print: Count 2 Print: Count 3
Hope it helps.
~sairam