{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 再贱就再见 的问题《Why does terminating a suspended (not resumable) s》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-874698.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
Why does terminating a suspended (not resumable) service instance report failed, yet it is terminated?
Using the Microsoft.BizTalk.Operations BizTalkOperations.TerminateInstance() on a "Suspended (resumable)" and a "Suspended (not resumable)" instance (a routing failure report)
Checking the return Microsoft.BizTalk.Operations.CompletionStatus, the suspended is "Succeeded", but the suspended not resumable returns "Failed"
Yet when I check in the BizTalk Admin and/or BizTalkOperations.GetServiceInstances(), both instances have gone!
So what is happening here?
Non Resumable instance typically is associated with its resumable instance. You must have terminated the suspended (resumable) prior to its corresponding suspended (non resumable) instance as a result you get a failure on non resumable because it got terminated as part of resumable instance. This is same behavior as you see in Admin Console.