How do control what files are included in a wheel? It appears MANIFEST.in
isn't used by python setup.py bdist_wheel
.
UPDATE:
I was wrong about the difference between installing from a source tarball vs a wheel. The source distribution includes files specified in MANIFEST.in
, but the installed package only has python files. Steps are needed to identify additional files that should be installed, whether the install is via source distribution, egg, or wheel. Namely, package_data is needed for additional package files, and data_files for files outside your package like command line scripts or system config files.
Original Question
I have a project where I've been using python setup.py sdist
to build my package, MANIFEST.in
to control the files included and excluded, and pyroma and check-manifest to confirm my settings.
I recently converted it to dual Python 2 / 3 code, and added a setup.cfg with
[bdist_wheel]
universal = 1
I can build a wheel with python setup.py bdist_wheel
, and it appears to be a universal wheel as desired. However, it doesn't include all of the files specified in MANIFEST.in
.
What gets installed?
I dug deeper, and now know more about packaging and wheel. Here's what I learned:
I upload two package files to the multigtfs project on PyPi:
multigtfs-0.4.2.tar.gz
- the source tar ball, which includes all the files inMANIFEST.in
.multigtfs-0.4.2-py2.py3-none-any.whl
- The binary distribution in question.
I created two new virtual environments, both with Python 2.7.5, and installed each package (pip install multigtfs-0.4.2.tar.gz
). The two environments are almost identical. They have different .pyc
files, which are the "compiled" Python files. There are log files which record the different paths on disk. The install from the source tar ball includes a folder multigtfs-0.4.2-py27.egg-info
, detailing the installation, and the wheel install has a multigtfs-0.4.2.dist-info
folder, with the details of that process. However, from the point of view of code using the multigtfs project, there is no difference between the two installation methods.
Explicitly, neither has the .zip files used by my test, so the test suite will fail:
$ django-admin startproject demo
$ cd demo
$ pip install psycopg2 # DB driver for PostGIS project
$ createdb demo # Create PostgreSQL database
$ psql -d demo -c "CREATE EXTENSION postgis" # Make it a PostGIS database
$ vi demo/settings.py # Add multigtfs to INSTALLED_APPS,
# Update DATABASE to set ENGINE to django.contrib.gis.db.backends.postgis
# Update DATABASE to set NAME to test
$ ./manage.py test multigtfs.tests # Run the tests
...
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/Users/john/.virtualenvs/test/lib/python2.7/site-packages/multigtfs/tests/fixtures/test3.zip'
Specifying additional files
Using the suggestions from the answers, I added some additional directives to setup.py
:
from __future__ import unicode_literals
# setup.py now requires some funky binary strings
...
setup(
name='multigtfs',
packages=find_packages(),
package_data={b'multigtfs': ['test/fixtures/*.zip']},
include_package_data=True,
...
)
This installs the zip files (as well as the README) to the folder, and tests now run correctly. Thanks for the suggestions!
"A wheel is a ZIP-format archive ..." (http://wheel.readthedocs.org/en/latest)
So, treat the .whl file just like a .zip file. Add a file with:
You can use
package_data
anddata_files
insetup.py
to specify additional files, but they are ridiculously hard to get right (and buggy).An alternative is to use
MANIFEST.in
and addinclude_package_data=True
insetup()
of yoursetup.py
as indicated here.With this directive, the
MANIFEST.in
will be used to specify the files to include not only in source tarball/zip, but also in wheel and win32 installer. This also works with any python version (i tested on a project from py2.6 to py3.6).Before you make any changes in
MANIFEST.in
orsetup.py
you must remove old output directories. Setuptools is caching some of the data and this can lead to unexpected results.If you don't do this, expect nothing to work correctly.
Now that is out of the way.
If you are building a source distribution (
sdist
) then you can use any method below.If you are building a wheel (
bdist_wheel
), theninclude_package_data
andMANIFEST.in
are ignored and you must usepackage_data
anddata_files
.INCLUDE_PACKAGE_DATA
This is a good option, but
bdist_wheel
does not honor it.DATA_FILES for non-package data
This is most flexible option because you can add any file from your repo to a
sdist
orbdist_wheel
PACKAGE_DATA for non-python files inside of the package
Similar to above, but for a
bdist_wheel
let's you put your data files inside of the package. It is identical forsdist
but has more limitations thandata_files
because files can only source from your package subdir.You can specify extra files to install using the data_files directive. Is that what you're looking for? Here's a small example:
Have you tried using
package_data
in yoursetup.py
?MANIFEST.in
seems targetted for python versions <= 2.6, I'm not sure if higher versions even look at it.After exploring https://github.com/pypa/sampleproject, their
MANIFEST.in
says:which seems to imply this method is outdated. Meanwhile, in
setup.py
they declare:(I'm not sure why they chose a wildcard in
MANIFEST.in
and a filename insetup.py
. They refer to the same file)Which, along with being simpler, again seems to imply that the
package_data
route is superior to theMANIFEST.in
method. Well, unless you have to support 2.6 that is, in which case my prayers go out to you.