I am having a problem binding radio buttons to an object whose properties have boolean values. I am trying to display exam questions retrieved from a $resource.
HTML:
<label data-ng-repeat="choice in question.choices">
<input type="radio" name="response" data-ng-model="choice.isUserAnswer" value="true" />
{{choice.text}}
</label>
JS:
$scope.question = {
questionText: "This is a test question.",
choices: [{
id: 1,
text: "Choice 1",
isUserAnswer: false
}, {
id: 2,
text: "Choice 2",
isUserAnswer: true
}, {
id: 3,
text: "Choice 3",
isUserAnswer: false
}]
};
With this example object, the "isUserAnswer: true" property does not cause the radio button to be selected. If I encapsulate the boolean values in quotes, it works.
JS:
$scope.question = {
questionText: "This is a test question.",
choices: [{
id: 1,
text: "Choice 1",
isUserAnswer: "false"
}, {
id: 2,
text: "Choice 2",
isUserAnswer: "true"
}, {
id: 3,
text: "Choice 3",
isUserAnswer: "false"
}]
};
Unfortunately my REST service treats that property as a boolean and it will be difficult to change the JSON serialization to encapsulate those values in quotes. Is there another way to set up the model binding without changing the structure of my model?
The way your radios are set up in the fiddle - sharing the same model - will cause only the last group to show a checked radio if you decide to quote all of the truthy values. A more solid approach will involve giving the individual groups their own model, and set the value as a unique attribute of the radios, such as the id:
Here is a representation of the new html:
And a fiddle.