I wrote a script that executes commands in parallel. I let them all write an entry to the same log file. It does not matter if the order is wrong or entries are interleaved, but i noticed that some entries are missing. I should probably lock the file before writing, however, is it true that if multiple processes try to write to a file simultaneously, it will result in missing entries?
相关问题
- I want to trace logs using a Macro multi parameter
- Error message 'No handlers could be found for
- multidplyr : assign functions to cluster
- convert logback.xml to log4j.properties
- Django management command doesn't show logging
相关文章
- how do I log requests and responses for debugging
- How to use doMC under Windows or alternative paral
- Making new files automatically executable?
- Reverse four length of letters with sed in unix
- Parallel while loop in R
- Does gfortran take advantage of DO CONCURRENT?
- Android Studio doesn't display logs by package
- Extracting columns from text file using Perl one-l
In a script you should use ">> file" (double greater than) to append output to that file. The interpreter will open the destination in "append" mode. If your program also wants to append, follow the directives below:
Open a text file in "append" mode ("a+") and give preference to printing only full lines (don't do multiple 'print' followed by a final 'println', but print the entire line with a single 'println').
The fopen documentation states this:
The character b has no effect, but is allowed for ISO C standard conformance (see standards(5)). Opening a file with read mode (r as the first character in the mode argument) fails if the file does not exist or cannot be read.
Opening a file with append mode (a as the first character in the mode argument) causes all subsequent writes to the file to be forced to the then current end-of-file, regardless of intervening calls to fseek(3C). If two separate processes open the same file for append, each process may write freely to the file without fear of destroying output being written by the other. The output from the two processes will be intermixed in the file in the order in which it is written.
It is because of this intermixing that you want to give preference to using only 'println' (or its equivalent).
Yes, if different processes independently open and write to the same file, it may result in overlapping writes and missing data. This happens because each process will get its own file pointer, that advances only by local writes.
Instead of locking, a better option might be to open the log file once in an ancestor of all worker processes, have it inherited across
fork()
, and used by them for logging. This means that there will be a single shared file pointer, that advances when any of the processes writes a new entry.