Bash - How to find the largest file in a directory

Question

We're just starting a UNIX class and are learning a variety of Bash commands. Our assignment involves performing various commands on a directory that has a number of folders under it as well.

I know how to list and count all the regular files from the root folder using:

find . -type l | wc -l

But I'd like to know where to go from there in order to find the largest file in the whole directory. I've seen somethings regarding a du command, but we haven't learned that, so in the repertoire of things we've learned I assume we need to somehow connect it to the ls -t command.

And pardon me if my 'lingo' isn't correct, I'm still getting used to it!

Answer 1

That is quite simpler way to do it:

ls -l | tr -s " " " " | cut -d " " -f 5,9 | sort -n -r | head -n 1***

And you'll get this: 8445 examples.desktop

Answer 2

Quote from this link-

If you want to find and print the top 10 largest files names (not directories) in a particular directory and its sub directories

$ find . -printf '%s %p\n'|sort -nr|head

To restrict the search to the present directory use "-maxdepth 1" with find.

$ find . -maxdepth 1 -printf '%s %p\n'|sort -nr|head

And to print the top 10 largest "files and directories":

$ du -a . | sort -nr | head

** Use "head -n X" instead of the only "head" above to print the top X largest files (in all the above examples)

Answer 3

Try the following one-liner (display top-20 biggest files):

ls -1Rs | sed -e "s/^ *//" | grep "^[0-9]" | sort -nr | head -n20

or (human readable sizes):

ls -1Rhs | sed -e "s/^ *//" | grep "^[0-9]" | sort -hr | head -n20

Works fine under Linux/BSD/OSX in comparison to other answers, as find's -printf option doesn't exist on OSX/BSD and stat has different parameters depending on OS. However the second command to work on OSX/BSD properly (as sort doesn't have -h), install sort from coreutils or remove -h from ls and use sort -nr instead.

So these aliases are useful to have in your rc files:

alias big='du -ah . | sort -rh | head -20'
alias big-files='ls -1Rhs | sed -e "s/^ *//" | grep "^[0-9]" | sort -hr | head -n20'

Answer 4

find . -type f | xargs ls -lS | head -n 1

outputs

-rw-r--r--  1 nneonneo  staff  9274991 Apr 11 02:29 ./devel/misc/test.out

If you just want the filename:

find . -type f | xargs ls -1S | head -n 1

This avoids using awk and allows you to use whatever flags you want in ls.

Caveat. Because xargs tries to avoid building overlong command lines, this might fail if you run it on a directory with a lot of files because ls ends up executing more than once. It's not an insurmountable problem (you can collect the head -n 1 output from each ls invocation, and run ls -S again, looping until you have a single file), but it does mar this approach somewhat.

Answer 5

This lists files recursively if they're normal files, sorts by the 7th field (which is size in my find output; check yours), and shows just the first file.

find . -type f -ls | sort +7 | head -1

The first option to find is the start path for the recursive search. A -type of f searches for normal files. Note that if you try to parse this as a filename, you may fail if the filename contains spaces, newlines or other special characters. The options to sort also vary by operating system. I'm using FreeBSD.

A "better" but more complex and heavier solution would be to have find traverse the directories, but perhaps use stat to get the details about the file, then perhaps use awk to find the largest size. Note that the output of stat also depends on your operating system.

Answer 6

To list the larger file in a folder

ls -sh /pathFolder | sort -rh | head -n 1

The output of ls -sh is a sized s and human h understandable view of the file size number.

You could use ls -shS /pathFolder | head -n 1. The bigger S from ls already order the list from the larger files to the smaller ones but the first result its the sum of all files in that folder. So if you want just to list the bigger file, one file, you need to head -n 2 and check at the "second line result" or use the first example with ls sort head.