See the following fragment of Perl code which is based on Moose:
$BusinessClass->meta->add_attribute($Key => { is => $rorw,
isa => $MooseType,
lazy => 0,
required => 0,
reader => sub { $_[0]->ORM->{$Key} },
writer => sub { $_[0]->ORM->newVal($Key, $_[1]) },
predicate => "has_$Key",
});
I receive the error:
bad accessor/reader/writer/predicate/clearer format, must be a HASH ref at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.20/Class/MOP/Class.pm line 899
The reason of the error is clear: reader and writer must be string names of functions.
But what to do it in this specific case? I do not want to create a new function for each of a hundred ORM fields (ORM attribute here is a tied hash). So I can't pass a string here, I need a closure.
Thus my coding needs resulted in a contradiction. I don't know what to do.
The above was a fragment of real code. Now I present a minimal example:
#!/usr/bin/perl
my @Fields = qw( af sdaf gdsg ewwq fsf ); # pretend that we have 100 fields
# Imagine that this is a tied hash with 100 fields
my %Data = map { $_ => rand } @Fields;
package Test;
use Moose;
foreach my $Key (@Fields) {
__PACKAGE__->meta->add_attribute($Key => { is => 'rw',
isa => 'Str',
lazy => 0,
required => 0,
reader => sub { $Data{$Key} },
writer => sub { $Data{$Key} = $_[1] },
});
}
Running it results in:
$ ./test.pl
bad accessor/reader/writer/predicate/clearer format, must be a HASH ref at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/perl5/5.22/Class/MOP/Class.pm line 899
Class::MOP::Class::try {...} at /usr/share/perl5/Try/Tiny.pm line 92
eval {...} at /usr/share/perl5/Try/Tiny.pm line 83
Try::Tiny::try('CODE(0x9dc6cec)', 'Try::Tiny::Catch=REF(0x9ea0c60)') called at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/perl5/5.22/Class/MOP/Class.pm line 904
Class::MOP::Class::_post_add_attribute('Moose::Meta::Class=HASH(0x9dc13f4)', 'Moose::Meta::Attribute=HASH(0x9dc6b5c)') called at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/perl5/5.22/Class/MOP/Mixin/HasAttributes.pm line 39
Class::MOP::Mixin::HasAttributes::add_attribute('Moose::Meta::Class=HASH(0x9dc13f4)', 'Moose::Meta::Attribute=HASH(0x9dc6b5c)') called at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/perl5/5.22/Moose/Meta/Class.pm line 572
Moose::Meta::Class::add_attribute('Moose::Meta::Class=HASH(0x9dc13f4)', 'af', 'HASH(0x9ea13a4)') called at test.pl line 18
I don't know what to do (how to create "dynamic" (closure-like) accessors, without writing an individual function for each of the 100 fields?)
I think changing the reader and writer methods like that requires an unhealthy level of insanity. If you want to, take a look at the source code of Class::MOP::Method::Accessor, which is used under the hood to create the accessors.
Instead, I suggest to just overwrite (or attach) the functionality to the Moose-generated readers using an
around
method modifier. To get that to work with sub-classes, you can use Class::Method::Modifiers instead of the Moosearound
.And then run a test.
Here's the STDOUT/STDERR from my machine.
As you can see, Moose doesn't really know about the values inside of the hash, but if you use the accessors, it will read and write them. The Moose object will slowly fill up with new values when you use the writer, but otherwise the values inside of the Moose object do not really matter.