I have a repository on bitbucket that contains three branches. I'm able to list the remote branches using a good old git branch --remote
command, and everything works perfectly. However, when I visit my repository using a browser, I can only see two branches. Someone please help. Bitbucket just ate my branch
相关问题
- Why does recursive submodule update from github fa
- Extended message for commit via Visual Studio Code
- Emacs shell: save commit message
- Can I organize Git submodules in a flat hierarchy?
- Upload file > 25 MB on Github
相关文章
- 请教Git如何克隆本地库?
- Access BitBucket payload data in Jenkins pipeline
- GitHub:Enterprise post-receive hook
- Git Clone Fails: Server Certificate Verification F
- SSIS solution on GIT?
- Is there a version control system abstraction for
- ssh: Could not resolve hostname git: Name or servi
- Cannot commit changes with gitextensions
The "active" filter on the Bitbucket branch screen only shows the main branch (usually named "master") and any branches that are ahead of the main branch. You can click "merged" at the top of the list to see branches that are still open, but which are no longer ahead of main.
Bitbucket also won't show branches that have been deleted in the Bitbucket UI, or branches closed with the "close branch" checkbox when merging a pull request. You'd have to re-push those if you really want them.