What I am trying to do is make a call to the database and then display the result in some HTML. I have everything working (the data comes back from the database just fine), except I can't figure out to display the data.
I know that fetch()
is async, but I'm not sure how to wire it into my collection view. Here is my Backbone:
(function() {
window.App = {
Models: {},
Collections: {},
Views: {},
Router: {}
};
window.template = function(id) {
return _.template( $('#' + id).html() );
};
App.Models.Main = Backbone.Model.extend({
defaults : {
FName: ''
}
});
App.Collections.Mains = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: App.Models.Main,
initialize: function(mains) {
this.fetch({success: function(main) {
$('#web-leads').html(main);
}});
},
url: '../leads/main_contact'
});
App.Views.Mains = Backbone.View.extend({
tagName: 'ul',
render: function() {
var ul = this.collection.each(this.addOne, this);
return ul;
},
addOne: function(main) {
var mainC = new App.Views.Main({ model: main});
this.$el.append(mainC.render().el);
return this;
}
});
App.Views.Main = Backbone.View.extend({
tagName: 'li',
template: template('mainContactTemplate'),
render: function () {
this.$el.html(this.template(this.model.toJSON()));
return this;
}
});
main = new App.Views.Main();
mains = new App.Collections.Mains(main);
})();
What I need to be able to is call $('#web-leads').html()
with the value returned from mains
. How do I do that?
The general pattern for this sort of thing in Backbone is:
fetch
call)So, as mu is too short suggested, your best bet is to follow this pattern and have your view bind a handler to your collection's
reset
event.It's worth mentioning however that
reset
won't always be the event you want to bind. For instance, you might not want to respond an AJAX request unless it changed attribute 'X' of the model. In that case you could instead bind tochange:X
, and then your handler would only be triggered if the AJAX response changed X.To see all your possible options, see:
http://documentcloud.github.com/backbone/#Events-catalog
You were on the right track just needed to have the view listening to the Collection rather than the collection listening to the view.
The below is your code with the slight modification of who listens to who.
Why? Ideally we want the Collections to know nothing of the Views.