Given that both the client and the server need to know everything about the object being remoted, firstly is this tight coupling, and secondly can .Net Remoting work in any other way?
相关问题
- Generic Generics in Managed C++
- How to Debug/Register a Permanent WMI Event Which
- 'System.Threading.ThreadAbortException' in
- Bulk update SQL Server C#
- Should I use static function in c# where many call
Not really answering your question, but if you want to loosen the coupling, you might look at WCF's NETTCP binding as an alternative. The client can create a proxy for the entities - this way you won't need to share any assemblies (notably Entities) between client and server.