we are looking into a full ALM solution in our company. we are looking into Polarion ALM and RTC. has anyone ever heard on Polarion complete ALM tool? if so, can you tell me the pros and cons for this tool? what about RTC? i would love to hear your thoughts. thanks! merav
相关问题
- Consistency of snapshot code in rtc?
- Who can check in and deliver to the stream in a re
- How to fetch RTC work item change sets using plain
- Should I ignore .copyarea.db file when commiting a
- ActiveX component can't create object: 'TD
相关文章
- Is there a method to get all the data in IBM Ratio
- Querying Jazz RTC Work Items via OSLC
- How to get workitem based on modified date and tim
- When should mvn release be used in the project lif
- How to migrate from RTC Jazz to Git?
- QTP/UFT - Close all browsers except QC/ALM
- Why aren't my pending changes being shown in R
- Getting filename, location and author of changed f
Those tools are both Application Life Management (like you mention in your question), and they both aims at streamlining the development lifecycle.
Currently deploying RTC, I can confirm that the feature comparison chart listed on Polarion site is... disingenuous at best.
From what I can see, all features are present on both products.
For RTC, the "Embedded Version Control Repository" is Jazz source control.
And RTC is based on a "Based on open standards & frameworks": Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC). See "Jazz Integration Architecture Overview".
The main point regarding RTC is that is an IBM product, meaning choosing that kind of product is often part of a larger set of tools/servers/services linked to IBM for your company.