I just downloaded the STL source code and I noticed all the definition for the STL template classes are included in the .h file. The actual source code for the function definition is in the .h file rather than .cpp/.c file. What is the reason for this?
相关问题
- Sorting 3 numbers without branching [closed]
- How to compile C++ code in GDB?
- Why does const allow implicit conversion of refere
- thread_local variables initialization
- What uses more memory in c++? An 2 ints or 2 funct
相关文章
- Class layout in C++: Why are members sometimes ord
- How to mock methods return object with deleted cop
- Which is the best way to multiply a large and spar
- C++ default constructor does not initialize pointe
- Selecting only the first few characters in a strin
- What exactly do pointers store? (C++)
- Converting glm::lookat matrix to quaternion and ba
- What is the correct way to declare and use a FILE
Think of templates as code generation. If you don't know beforehand what template will be used with, you can't compile. So you need to keep the implementation in the header.
This allows some inlining and that explains why sometimes using templated stuff (like std::sort) works faster than in plain C.
Because very few compilers implement linking of templates. It's hard.
Here's a brief but (I think) informative article about it: http://www.informit.com/guides/content.aspx?g=cplusplus&seqNum=53
I say "I think" because it's really not something I'm very familiar with other than that it's widely unimplemented. I initially said the standard didn't require it, but looking at the definition of "export" in C++03, I don't see any indication that it's optional. Maybe it's just a failed standard.