I have the following class, which as you will see has rather a rather redundant formatNameAndAddress method:
package hu.flux.helper;
import java.io.PrintWriter;
import javax.servlet.jsp.JspWriter;
// A holder for formatting data
public class NameAndAddress
{
public String firstName;
public String middleName;
public String lastName;
public String address1;
public String address2;
public String city;
public String state;
public String zip;
// Print out the name and address.
public void formatNameAndAddress(JspWriter out)
throws java.io.IOException
{
out.println("<PRE>");
out.print(firstName);
// Print the middle name only if it contains data.
if ((middleName != null) && (middleName.length() > 0))
{out.print(" " + middleName);}
out.println(" " + lastName);
out.println(" " + address1);
if ((address2 != null) && (address2.length() > 0))
out.println(" " + address2);
out.println(city + ", " + state + " " + zip);
out.println("</PRE>");
}
public void formatName(PrintWriter out)
{
out.println("<PRE>");
out.print(firstName);
// Print the middle name only if it contains data.
if ((middleName != null) && (middleName.length() > 0))
{out.print(" " + middleName);}
out.println(" " + lastName);
out.println(" " + address1);
if ((address2 != null) && (address2.length() > 0))
out.println(" " + address2);
out.println(city + ", " + state + " " + zip);
out.println("</PRE>");
}
}
I'd like to rewrite the class to use a generic method like:
// Print out the name and address.
private void genericFormatNameAndAddress(Object out)
{
out.println("<PRE>");
out.print(firstName);
// Print the middle name only if it contains data.
if ((middleName != null) && (middleName.length() > 0))
{out.print(" " + middleName);}
out.println(" " + lastName);
out.println(" " + address1);
if ((address2 != null) && (address2.length() > 0))
out.println(" " + address2);
out.println(city + ", " + state + " " + zip);
out.println("</PRE>");
}
But, I can't do this exactly like this because Object doesn't have print() and println() methods. If I cast the output to either JspWriter or PrintWriter, I'd be casting it the wrong way sometimes.
I imagine what I need to do is somehow pass the object type as a variable and then use the variable to determine how to cast. Is this possible? If so, how? If not, what would be a good solution?
Both
JspWriter
andPrintWriter
are subclasses ofjava.io.Writer
. Since you don't use any functionality that is specific to any of the two, you can declare the method as taking ajava.io.Writer
:Then pass a
JspWriter
orPrintWriter
as required.Edit: This won't work without actually modifying the code since, as pointed out by others,
Writer
doesn't haveprint
andprintln
methods, whereasJspWriter
andPrintWriter
both provide them.You're kind of muddling two different tasks with these methods, and breaking the OO principle of specialization. That is, you have methods which are responsible for formatting one of two types of strings... AND responsible for sending them to one of two types of output targets.
A better approach might be to make your methods more specialized. That is, have them ONLY be responsible for building a "Name" string or a "Name and Address" string... and return
String
as the methods' return type.At the point in code where you're invoking these methods, you obviously already have a
JspWriter
or aPrintWriter
object... because right now you're passing it as an method argument. So it would be cleaner to simply leave that object where it is in the code, and have it print out theString
which is returned by your specialized output-agnostic method.This will probably work:
If you want to cast the object to the correct Writer you can try something like:
Barkers solution seems to be better suited because a Printwriter can be constructed out of a JspWriter.