{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 戒情不戒烟 的问题《Why is the size of .NET Framework 4.0 installer sm》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-764315.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
As I can see, beta2 of .Net Framework 4.0 installation program is only 55MB, and it was 200+MB for .Net 3.5, What's happening?
相关问题
- How does the setup bootstrapper detect if prerequi
- Generic Generics in Managed C++
- How to Debug/Register a Permanent WMI Event Which
- 'System.Threading.ThreadAbortException' in
- Bulk update SQL Server C#
This follow on from the work done to optimise the framework for the Silverlight plug-in.
.net is now 10 years old, new techniques and just some good old fashioned spring cleaning of the code is before performed on version 4, to (hopefully) give us a sharper, more refined and more capable framework with the new version.
.NET 3.5 size is that big because it contains the x64 version of the framework in the same package. The 2.0, 3.0 packages were separated for x86 vs x64. I guess 4.0 will adopt a separated approach too. This link explains it: link