In git, what is the difference between merge --squ

2018-12-31 16:16发布

I'm new to git and I'm trying to understand the difference between a squash and a rebase. As I understand it you perform a squash when doing a rebase.

3条回答
旧人旧事旧时光
2楼-- · 2018-12-31 16:53

Merge commits: retains all of the commits in your branch and interleaves them with commits on the base branchenter image description here

Merge Squash: retains the changes but omits the individual commits from history enter image description here

Rebase: This moves the entire feature branch to begin on the tip of the master branch, effectively incorporating all of the new commits in master

enter image description here

More on here

查看更多
君临天下
3楼-- · 2018-12-31 16:58

Merge squash merges a tree (a sequence of commits) into a single commit. That is, it squashes all changes made in n commits into a single commit.

Rebasing is re-basing, that is, choosing a new base (parent commit) for a tree. Maybe the mercurial term for this is more clear: they call it transplant because it's just that: picking a new ground (parent commit, root) for a tree.

When doing an interactive rebase, you're given the option to either squash, pick, edit or skip the commits you are going to rebase.

Hope that was clear!

查看更多
深知你不懂我心
4楼-- · 2018-12-31 17:00

Both git merge --squash and git rebase --interactive can produce a "squashed" commit.
But they serve different purposes.

will produce a squashed commit on the destination branch, without marking any merge relationship.
(Note: it does not produce a commit right away: you need an additional git commit -m "squash branch")
This is useful if you want to throw away the source branch completely, going from (schema taken from SO question):

 git checkout stable

      X                   stable
     /                   
a---b---c---d---e---f---g tmp

to:

git merge --squash tmp
git commit -m "squash tmp"

      X-------------------G stable
     /                   
a---b---c---d---e---f---g tmp

and then deleting tmp branch.

replays some or all of your commits on a new base, allowing you to squash (or more recently "fix up", see this SO question), going directly to:

git checkout tmp
git rebase -i stable

      stable
      X-------------------G tmp
     /                     
a---b

If you choose to squash all commits of tmp (but, contrary to merge --squash, you can choose to replay some, and squashing others).

So the differences are:

  • merge does not touch your source branch (tmp here) and creates a single commit where you want.
  • rebase allows you to go on on the same source branch (still tmp) with:
    • a new base
    • a cleaner history
查看更多
登录 后发表回答