{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 啃猪蹄的小仙女 的问题《Why is google not using a headless browser to craw》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-759090.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
I'm aware of the steps it takes to make a client side website crawlable:
https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/docs/getting-started?hl=nl
I just wonder, why isn't Google just integrating a headless browser in their crawlers to save us the pain of providing html snapshots via e.g. NodeJS and a server side DOM implementation?
I guess their might be a technical reason that I'm missing. I just don't see it.