{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 地球回转人心会变 的问题《reliable multicast in C#》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-751778.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
what are my options for reliable multicast in c# /.Net 3.5?
I don’t want to use MSMQ.
I am open to commercial as well as open source options.
Thanks
相关问题
- Sorting 3 numbers without branching [closed]
- Graphics.DrawImage() - Throws out of memory except
- Why am I getting UnauthorizedAccessException on th
- 求获取指定qq 资料的方法
- How to know full paths to DLL's from .csproj f
ActiveMQ is an excellent product by the Apache organization. There's bindings for lots of languages, including C#.
In the commercial world Tibco EMS is a good choice. Its got bindings for C# and Java.
Take a look at EmCaster
http://www.29west.com/ claims to be the lowest latency reliable multicast solution available. I have not verified this claim, but in talking to them, it seems that their biggest competition is not some other vendor, but in house developemnt. Why not just set up your own multicast group, and use it directly? Chapter 21 of "Unix Network Programming Volume 1" describes how to do this.
The best one I've used, after evaluating a bunch was Mesongo RMF - it had a really clean API and good monitoring tools.
The pragmatic variant, PGM, it's in your Windows image, look for it on say server 2003, even XP and friends.. there are socket options for it (Rdm or similar).