I'm building a tiny MVC framework for learning/experimenting and small project purposes. I needed to find out the basics of the internals of the Model since a full MVC framework and ORM is overkill for just a few database calls.
Class Model
{
}
Using an empty class where would I have to call a new PDO
object for database calls?
What would calling a query look like inside the Model?
Additionally, where can I find a beginner's web/book resource to MVC (with lots of example code)? I've heard a lot of terms such as business logic and database logic. I remember reading somewhere that you should separate business logic and database logic. I can understand the concept somewhat, I just wonder what it looks like or what they mean in code itself. I'm confused how business logic and database logic should be separated but still be inside the Model.
I'm mostly looking for code/logic examples as answers, except maybe the latter paragraph.
Obviously you don't want to create a new connection every time you create a new model, so you want to initialize the PDO object separately. (I did run across an in-house MVC framework once where Model extended their database class! As you can imagine it wasn't fast...)
Maybe something like this is what you want?
Example of usage
As for finding examples? Try googling for "php mvc" and looking at the articles that come up
In my experience different frameworks interpret MVC somewhat loosely and usually with some deviations. However they usually agree that MVC is divided like this:
I use Symfony a lot and can give you a couple of small examples. Mind you, these are hugely simplified. :p
The Model:
The View (just showing a snippet here):
The Controller:
The controller is the place where a request gets handled. It will analyze the request and figure out which action (eg. myUnitActions::executeIndex() from above) in a model that should be called.
Last notes:
I'm sure you can see whats happening in the code above (a lot of convenience is added by the ORM). You have the controller dispatching a request to the model, the model operating withing your problem-domain plus actually pulling data from a database and lastly the view displaying the data.
This has many benefits to you as a developer as it allows for easier and more reliable testing, among other things.
An excellend read for you would be the 21 Days With Jobeet guide from the people behind Symfony. It's a nice piece of work.
You should also have a look at the code for both Symfony and Zend. They are both excellend. Also have a look at a couple of ORM's like Doctrine and Propel.
Also see the Wikipedia article on MVC.
Model
itself should not contain any SQL. Ever. It is meant to only contain domain business logic.The approach i would recommend is to separate the responsibilities, which are not strictly "business logic" into two other other sets of constructs : Domain Objects and Data Mappers.
For example, if you are making a blog, then the Model will not be Post. Instead most likely the model will be Blog , and this model will deal with multiple
Domain Objects
: multiple instances of Post, Comment, User and maybe other objects.In your model, the domain objects should not know how to store themselves in database. Or even be aware of the existence of any form of storage. That is a responsibility of
Data Mappers
. All you should do in the Model is to call$mapper->store( $comment );
. And the data mapper should know how to store one specific type of domain objects, and win which table to put the information ( usually the storage of of single domain object actually affects multiple tables ).Some code
(only relevant fragments from files):
_
in example isprotected
from
/application/bootstrap.php
from
/framework/classes/ModelFactory.php
file
/application/controllers/SomeController.php
file
/application/models/FooModel.php
I hope this will help you understand the separation between DB logic and business logic ( and actually , presentation logic too )
Few notes
Model should never extend Database or ORM, because Model is not a subset of them. By extending a class, you are declaring that has all the characteristics of the superclass, but with minor exceptions.
Besides the obvious logic-issues, if your Model is tightly coupled with underlaying Database, it makes the code extremely hard to test (talking about Unit Testing (video)).
I personally think, that ORMs are useless and in large project - even harmful. Problem stems from the fact that ORMs are trying to bridge two completely different ways of approaching problems : OOP and SQL.
If you start project with ORM then, after short learning curve, you are able to write simple queries very fast. But by the time you start hitting the ORM's limitations and problems, you are already completely invested in the use of ORM ( maybe even new people were hired , who were really good at your chosen , but sucked at plain SQL ). You end up in situation where every new DB related issue take more and more time to solve. And if you have been using ORM based on ActiveRecord pattern, then the problems directly influence your Models.
Uncle Bob calls this "technical debt".
Few books
loosely related to subject
You could have a look at the data mapper model approach referred to by the Zend framework model manual
Then you have a model containing properties, and have a mapper which does the actual database interaction to populate the model.