I create a new branch in Git:
git branch my_branch
Push it:
git push origin my_branch
Now say someone made some changes on the server and I want to pull from origin/my_branch
. I do:
git pull
But I get:
You asked me to pull without telling me which branch you
want to merge with, and 'branch.my_branch.merge' in
your configuration file does not tell me, either. Please
specify which branch you want to use on the command line and
try again (e.g. 'git pull <repository> <refspec>').
See git-pull(1) for details.
If you often merge with the same branch, you may want to
use something like the following in your configuration file:
[branch "my_branch"]
remote = <nickname>
merge = <remote-ref>
[remote "<nickname>"]
url = <url>
fetch = <refspec>
See git-config(1) for details.
I learned that I can make it work with:
git branch --set-upstream my_branch origin/my_branch
But why do I need to do this for every branch I create? Isn't it obvious that if I push my_branch
into origin/my_branch
, then I would want to pull origin/my_branch
into my_branch
? How can I make this the default behavior?
You can set up a really good alias that can handle this without the overly verbose syntax.
I have the following alias in
~/.gitconfig
:After making a commit on a new branch, you can push your new branch by simply typing the command:
This is my most common use for The Fuck.
Also, it's fun to type swear words in your terminal.
For those looking for an alias that works with
git pull
, this is what I use:Now whenever you get:
Just run:
And you're good to go
You can make this happen with less typing. First, change the way your push works:
This will infer the
origin my_branch
part, thus you can do:Which will both create the remote branch with the same name and track it.
A shortcut, which doesn't depend on remembering the syntax for
git branch --set-upstream
1 is to do:... the first time that you push that branch. Or, to push to the current branch to a branch of the same name (handy for an alias):
You only need to use
-u
once, and that sets up the association between your branch and the one atorigin
in the same way asgit branch --set-upstream
does.Personally, I think it's a good thing to have to set up that association between your branch and one on the remote explicitly. It's just a shame that the rules are different for
git push
andgit pull
.1 It may sound silly, but I very frequently forget to specify the current branch, assuming that's the default - it's not, and the results are most confusing :)
Update 2012-10-11: Apparently I'm not the only person who found it easy to get wrong! Thanks to VonC for pointing out that git 1.8.0 introduces the more obvious
git branch --set-upstream-to
, which can be used as follows, if you're on the branchmy_branch
:... or with the short option:
This change, and its reasoning, is described in the release notes for git 1.8.0, release candidate 1:
You can also do
git push -u origin $(current_branch)