For gcc, this answer tells us how we can verify that Link-Time Optimization was performed. For clang, I cannot see any entries similar to .gnu.lto
.
More specifically, I have a binary where I am quite sure that LTO should have a significant benefit, but I am seeing nothing. I wonder if cmake actually does the right thing.
Is there any way to tell if clang performed LTO by looking at a binary or an *.o file?
An option would be to try running
llvm-dis
on one of your .o files. If the LTO was actually performed, the .o files contain llvm bitcode andllvm-dis
will produce the .ll file containing humain-readable llvm ir. Otherwise it will produce the error message "error: Invalid bitcode signature".The
file
utility will report that the file is "LLVM IR bitcode". LLVM/clang's LTO facilities don't produce "fat" object files, it's just IR.