I am trying to load a controller based on a stateparam to make it reusable
.state("dashboard.item.detail", {
url: "/detailId/:detailId/detailName/:detailName",
views: {
'main@': {
templateUrl: function ($stateParams){
//move this to a util function later
var tempName = unescape($stateParams.detailName);
tempName = tempName.replace(/\s/g, "-");
return '../partials/slides/' + tempName + '.html';
},
resolve: {
DetailData: ['DetailService', function(DetailService){
return DetailService.getDetails();
}]
},
controller: function ($stateParams) {
console.log( $stateParams.detailName + 'Ctrl');
return $stateParams.detailName + 'Ctrl';
}
}
}
})
Controller
.controller('NemtCtrl', ['$scope', '$rootScope', 'DetailData', function ($scope, $rootScope, detailData) {
console.log(detailData);
}]);
The controller will work if I remove the function and just use (console will log detailData)
controller: 'NemtCtrl'
But won't work if I do:
controller: function ($stateParams) {
return 'NemtCtrl';
}
What am I doing wrong here? Is there a better way to do this?
What is happening here is that when you write this:
You tell angular to get the controller named 'NemtCtrl'. But when you on the other hand write this:
you are defining a controller for that state.
Update
According to the ui-router docs the way to do is as follows:
You can read more about it here
Update 2
For your case it would be something like: