{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 爷、活的狠高调 的问题《Firefox vs Chrome for iMacros》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-680328.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
Which browser is better to use iMacros? I prefer the faster running one.
Try to explain it as well. If it's just a quick answer please comment instead.
相关问题
- Is there a limit to how many levels you can nest i
- How to toggle on Order in ReactJS
- void before promise syntax
- Keeping track of variable instances
- Can php detect if javascript is on or not?
I've found that Firefox is greatly faster with iMacros than Chrome. I use Chrome for 90% of all my tasks, but when doing something macro-heavy, I use Firefox.
I use FireFox since I can use JS scripting in FireFox. So far I didn't find a way to use .js files in Chrome.
With pictures disables FireFox can be just as good as Chrome. Also there is some difference in Chrome and FireFox iMacros code. So sometimes FF scripts don't work in Chrome.