I was experimenting with Java reflection and inlined Strings and came up with the result which I find confusing.
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
public class HappyDebugging {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
defineTrueFalse();
System.out.println("true is " + true); // why is it "true is true"?
System.out.println("false is " + false);
System.out.println(true);
System.out.println(false);
System.out.println("true");
System.out.println("false");
System.out.println("true is " + Boolean.valueOf(true));
System.out.println("false is " + Boolean.valueOf(false));
System.out.println("true is " + Boolean.valueOf("true"));
System.out.println("false is " + Boolean.valueOf("false"));
}
static void defineTrueFalse() throws Exception{
Field field = String.class.getDeclaredField("value");
field.setAccessible(true);
field.set("true", new char[] {'f', 'a', 'l', 's', 'e'});
field.set("false", new char[] {'t', 'r', 'u', 'e'});
field = String.class.getDeclaredField("offset");
field.setAccessible(true);
field.setInt("true", 0);
field.setInt("false", 0);
field = String.class.getDeclaredField("count");
field.setAccessible(true);
field.setInt("true", 5);
field.setInt("false", 4);
}
}
Why are first two lines in the output are
true is true
false is false
I would expect them to be
true is false
false is true
Please note the output varies on different platforms.
this seems to be working....
defineTrueFalse
has no effect so"true is " + true
is treated as"true is " + Boolean.toString(true)
thats why it give you result astrue is true
The answer is simple. These two lines
do the following. 1. the simple value of type boolean "true" ist converted into String which results in the string "true". The same for "false", and that's it
Because you're messing with the content of interned String literals (in a way that will damn your soul to eternal suffering in the ninth circle of hell, I might add), but your first two lines concatenate boolean literals, not String literals. Nothing in
defineTrueFalse()
has any effect on the boolean valuestrue
andfalse
(as opposed to the String literals"true"
and"false"
).But not for the first two lines, I'd wager. For the String-related stuff that may be, since the behaviour depends on the interning of String literals, which I don't think is guaranteed by the spec (thus, ninth circle of Hell).
In my compiler, those two lines get compiled to use the actual strings
"true is true"
and"false is false"
(that is, no run-time concatenation occurs), so your reflective evil comes too late. You say that the output depends on the platform, so I guess some compilers must not perform this optimization.