acts_as_tree vs ancestry gem for tree menu [closed

2019-05-14 01:46发布

I want to implement a tree menu (simple example of tree menu) in a Rails app that I am working on. I am unsure of whether to use acts_as_tree or Ancestry. Its seems that it would be easier to implements a simple tree menu using acts_as_tree, however, Ancestry is more popular and regularly maintained. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?

1条回答
老娘就宠你
2楼-- · 2019-05-14 02:25

Use ancestry. It has more powerful query capabilities as it implements the materialized path pattern, as opposed to acts_as_tree that implements adjacency list.
There are other options too, like nested set, but materialized path is usually the most comprehensive.

https://communities.bmc.com/communities/docs/DOC-9902

If you need to sort in preorder at DB level (for example a paginated tree-grid, a preloaded menu that you iterate and indent/dedent according to the depth in tree for displaying) you need to either use a recursive query, or sortable encoding like nested set or nested interval. (That is if sorting in memory is not an option, and it almost never is.)

https://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set
https://github.com/clyfe/acts_as_nested_interval

Each has ups and downs. Choose your what fits you.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答