I have following class structure:
public abstract class PresenterBase
{
public static Dictionary<string, MethodInfo> methodsList;
public void Bind()
public void Initialize();
}
public class DevicePresenter: PresenterBase
{
public void ShowScreen();
public void HandleEvents();
}
public class HomePresenter: PresenterBase
{
public void ShowScreen();
public void HandleEvents();
}
I want to have HomePresenter and DevicePresenter to have separate copy of methodsList static member defined in PresenterBase.
Unfortunately they share the same copy with above implementation.
Is they alternative approach, that I can have separate copy of methodsList for HomePresenter and DevicePresenter? I am not willing to define methodsList in derived classes because in future if someone adds another derived class he will have to keep in mind to add methodsList to that class.
Don't make it static at all. Won't that work?
static
means associated with the type; non-static
means associated with the instance.I don't have a Visual Studio instance handy, but I believe you could also mark the field
abstract
in the base class; then the compiler will require you to add it to any deriving classes. You can definitely do that with a property.On another note, given the above code, I would probably add abstract methods
ShowScreen()
andHandleEvents()
toPresenterBase
.I would not make it static, as you want each instance to have its own list, define methodsList as a property of PresenterBase and define a constructor in PresenterBase which takes the
Dictionary<string, MethodInfo>
and sets the propety to this valueThat way you ensure that any derived class must provide this, but each instance has its own list.
I would also define abstract methods
ShowScreen()
andHandleEvents()
to thePresenterBase
as @Michael Kjorling suggestsTo answer the question directly, you could make the base class generic, this will give you seperate static dictionaries, if this is a good design or not is another question.