Gaussian fit for Python

2019-01-07 14:02发布

I'm trying to fit a Gaussian for my data (which is already a rough gaussian). I've already taken the advice of those here and tried curve_fit and leastsq but I think that I'm missing something more fundamental (in that I have no idea how to use the command). Here's a look at the script I have so far

import pylab as plb
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Read in data -- first 2 rows are header in this example. 
data = plb.loadtxt('part 2.csv', skiprows=2, delimiter=',')

x = data[:,2]
y = data[:,3]
mean = sum(x*y)
sigma = sum(y*(x - mean)**2)

def gauss_function(x, a, x0, sigma):
    return a*np.exp(-(x-x0)**2/(2*sigma**2))
popt, pcov = curve_fit(gauss_function, x, y, p0 = [1, mean, sigma])
plt.plot(x, gauss_function(x, *popt), label='fit')

# plot data

plt.plot(x, y,'b')

# Add some axis labels

plt.legend()
plt.title('Fig. 3 - Fit for Time Constant')
plt.xlabel('Time (s)')
plt.ylabel('Voltage (V)')
plt.show()

What I get from this is a gaussian-ish shape which is my original data, and a straight horizontal line.

enter image description here

Also, I'd like to plot my graph using points, instead of having them connected. Any input is appreciated!

6条回答
贪生不怕死
2楼-- · 2019-01-07 14:14

Here is corrected code:

import pylab as plb
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
from scipy import asarray as ar,exp

x = ar(range(10))
y = ar([0,1,2,3,4,5,4,3,2,1])

n = len(x)                          #the number of data
mean = sum(x*y)/n                   #note this correction
sigma = sum(y*(x-mean)**2)/n        #note this correction

def gaus(x,a,x0,sigma):
    return a*exp(-(x-x0)**2/(2*sigma**2))

popt,pcov = curve_fit(gaus,x,y,p0=[1,mean,sigma])

plt.plot(x,y,'b+:',label='data')
plt.plot(x,gaus(x,*popt),'ro:',label='fit')
plt.legend()
plt.title('Fig. 3 - Fit for Time Constant')
plt.xlabel('Time (s)')
plt.ylabel('Voltage (V)')
plt.show()

result:
enter image description here

查看更多
Deceive 欺骗
3楼-- · 2019-01-07 14:20

You get a horizontal straight line because it did not converge.

Better convergence is attained if the first parameter of the fitting (p0) is put as max(y), 5 in the example, instead of 1.

查看更多
神经病院院长
4楼-- · 2019-01-07 14:24
sigma = sum(y*(x - mean)**2)

should be

sigma = np.sqrt(sum(y*(x - mean)**2))
查看更多
叼着烟拽天下
5楼-- · 2019-01-07 14:31

There is another way of performing the fit, which is by using the 'lmfit' package. It basically uses the cuve_fit but is much better in fitting and offers complex fitting as well. Detailed step by step instructions are given in the below link. http://cars9.uchicago.edu/software/python/lmfit/model.html#model.best_fit

查看更多
爱情/是我丢掉的垃圾
6楼-- · 2019-01-07 14:32

Explanation

You need good starting values such that the curve_fit function converges at "good" values. I can not really say why your fit did not converge (even though the definition of your mean is strange - check below) but I will give you a strategy that works for non-normalized Gaussian-functions like your one.

Example

The estimated parameters should be close to the final values (use the weighted arithmetic mean - divide by the sum of all values):

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
import numpy as np

x = np.arange(10)
y = np.array([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1])

# weighted arithmetic mean (corrected - check the section below)
mean = sum(x * y) / sum(y)
sigma = np.sqrt(sum(y * (x - mean)**2) / sum(y))

def Gauss(x, a, x0, sigma):
    return a * np.exp(-(x - x0)**2 / (2 * sigma**2))

popt,pcov = curve_fit(Gauss, x, y, p0=[max(y), mean, sigma])

plt.plot(x, y, 'b+:', label='data')
plt.plot(x, Gauss(x, *popt), 'r-', label='fit')
plt.legend()
plt.title('Fig. 3 - Fit for Time Constant')
plt.xlabel('Time (s)')
plt.ylabel('Voltage (V)')
plt.show()

I personally prefer using numpy.

Comment on the definition of the mean (including Developer's answer)

Since the reviewers did not like my edit on #Developer's code, I will explain for what case I would suggest an improved code. The mean of developer does not correspond to one of the normal definitions of the mean.

Your definition returns:

>>> sum(x * y)
125

Developer's definition returns:

>>> sum(x * y) / len(x)
12.5 #for Python 3.x

The weighted arithmetic mean:

>>> sum(x * y) / sum(y)
5.0

Similarly you can compare the definitions of standard deviation (sigma). Compare with the figure of the resulting fit:

Resulting fit

Comment for Python 2.x users

In Python 2.x you should additionally use the new division to not run into weird results or convert the the numbers before the division explicitly:

from __future__ import division

or e.g.

sum(x * y) * 1. / sum(y)
查看更多
我想做一个坏孩纸
7楼-- · 2019-01-07 14:34

After losing hours trying to find my error, the problem is your formula:

sigma = sum(y*(x-mean)**2)/n this is wrong, the correct formula is the squareroot of this!;

sqrt(sum(y*(x-mean)**2)/n)

Hope this helps

查看更多
登录 后发表回答