I wonder if there is any simpler way to achieve this rule. Just started to experiment with firestore.
match /emails/{emailId} {
allow write: if request.resource.data.attachments.size() == 0
|| request.resource.data.attachments.size() == 1 && request.resource.data.attachments[0].fileSize < 3 * 1024 * 1024 && (request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'image/png' || request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'image/jpg' || request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'application/vnd.ms-excel')
|| request.resource.data.attachments.size() == 2 && request.resource.data.attachments[0].fileSize < 3 * 1024 * 1024 && (request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'image/png' || request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'image/jpg' || request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'application/vnd.ms-excel') && request.resource.data.attachments[1].fileSize < 3 * 1024 * 1024 && (request.resource.data.attachments[1].filetype == 'image/png' || request.resource.data.attachments[1].filetype == 'image/jpg' || request.resource.data.attachments[1].filetype == 'application/vnd.ms-excel')
|| request.resource.data.attachments.size() == 3 && request.resource.data.attachments[0].fileSize < 3 * 1024 * 1024 && (request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'image/png' || request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'image/jpg' || request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'application/vnd.ms-excel') && request.resource.data.attachments[1].fileSize < 3 * 1024 * 1024 && (request.resource.data.attachments[1].filetype == 'image/png' || request.resource.data.attachments[1].filetype == 'image/jpg' || request.resource.data.attachments[1].filetype == 'application/vnd.ms-excel') && request.resource.data.attachments[2].fileSize < 3 * 1024 * 1024 && (request.resource.data.attachments[2].filetype == 'image/png' || request.resource.data.attachments[2].filetype == 'image/jpg' || request.resource.data.attachments[2].filetype == 'application/vnd.ms-excel')
|| request.resource.data.attachments.size() == 4 && request.resource.data.attachments[0].fileSize < 3 * 1024 * 1024 && (request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'image/png' || request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'image/jpg' || request.resource.data.attachments[0].filetype == 'application/vnd.ms-excel') && request.resource.data.attachments[1].fileSize < 3 * 1024 * 1024 && (request.resource.data.attachments[1].filetype == 'image/png' || request.resource.data.attachments[1].filetype == 'image/jpg' || request.resource.data.attachments[1].filetype == 'application/vnd.ms-excel') && request.resource.data.attachments[2].fileSize < 3 * 1024 * 1024 && (request.resource.data.attachments[2].filetype == 'image/png' || request.resource.data.attachments[2].filetype == 'image/jpg' || request.resource.data.attachments[2].filetype == 'application/vnd.ms-excel') && request.resource.data.attachments[3].fileSize < 3 * 1024 * 1024 && (request.resource.data.attachments[3].filetype == 'image/png' || request.resource.data.attachments[3].filetype == 'image/jpg' || request.resource.data.attachments[3].filetype == 'application/vnd.ms-excel');
}
We don't allow loop constructs in Rules because we rely upon several optimization techniques that are much harder with more complex structures. We also don't charge compute time for Rules execution, which means we don't want them getting too complex and potentially abusive.
With the repetition in your rules, I'd highly encourage using the function() feature to simplify. For example this is < 1/3 the size:
Here's how I simplified it (worth double-checking as I might have mistyped).
attachments
for the request data being accessed since it's used a bunched - this made it a lot easy skim the rules.attach_cnt
for the number of attachments since that was checked a lot.valid_size
for that test, using a parameterattach
that I could pass it.valid_type
which worked the same way, but did the check to make sure it was a valid type.