In my code I have a class named membrane
with a function named exciteMod()
, a function named decide()
and a variable named delta_U
. The first line of exciteMod()
is this->delta_U = 0
. In decide()
I have an exponent of -delta_U
(exp(-this->delta_U)
). which cause an error Use of uninitialised value of size 8. What might cause this? I don't have any error about delta_U
which is generated in valgrind.
Edit: Here are the relevant segment of the code:
void membrane::exciteMod(){
this->delta_U = 0;
/* Do some stuff which does not directly affect this->delta_U*/
std::tr1::shared_ptr<bead> bit = this->beads.begin();
while (bit != this->nead.end()){
std::tr1::shared_ptr<bead> b = *bit++;
//calculate the doubles U and nextU on b, nothing here gives a warning in valgrind, anyhow U and nextU on b are always defined
this->delta_U += (b->nextU - b->U);
}
decide();
}
void membrane::decide(){
double r = P.r.ran3() // the random function from numerical recepies
double f = - this->delta_U;
if (r > exp(f)){ //this gives the warning even though delta_U is valid
/*stuff*/
}
}
This is the warning:
==467== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==467== at 0x300B00D75D: __ieee754_exp (in /lib64/libm-2.5.so)
==467== by 0x300B022FA3: exp (in /lib64/libm-2.5.so)
==467== by 0x40BB9A: membrane::decide() (membrane.cpp:813)
==467== by 0x40EBB1: membrane::exciteMod() (membrane.cpp:639)
==467== by 0x413994: membrane::MCstep(int) (membrane.cpp:486)
==467== by 0x402767: main (main.cpp:14)
Edit:
I should have mentioned that the only place where I call decide()
is inside of exciteMod()
.
The most likely cause of uninitialized value is that at least one of
b->nextU
orb->U
that you are adding todelta_U
is itself uninitialized. That is:You would like Valgrind to report when foo becomes uninitialized. Unfortunately, doing so produces too many "false positive" warnings to be practical.
You can insert into your loop calls to
VALGRIND_CHECK_MEM_IS_DEFINED
(see Valgrind user manual), and Valgrind will signal the exact moment whendelta_U
becomes undefined.