Will an interface-implementing form free itself wh

2019-04-28 16:22发布

If I implement an interface on a form such as TMyForm = class(TForm, IMyInterface), will the object free itself when there are no more interface references to it? It seems not to, although I couldn't work out how TForm is reference counted (if at all). I'm concerned about the form getting freed when an interface reference goes out of scope, but this does not seem to happen.

I guess there are two parts to the question, firstly whether a form might get unexpectedly freed (the real question), and secondly how forms are reference counted.

2条回答
够拽才男人
2楼-- · 2019-04-28 16:37

TForm derives from TComponent, which implements _AddRef() and _Release() to disable reference counting on itself. As such, any interface implemented by any TComponent descendant class, like TForm, will not free its implementing TComponent object by default when the interface is released.

However, if an IVCLComObject interface is assigned to the TComponent.VCLCOMObject property, then TComponent will delegate reference counting to that object, so that object can be freed if its reference count falls to 0 (TComponent does not increment the reference count of its IVCLCOMObject reference).

This is valid for all descendants of TComponent, unless they implement any reference counting of their own by overriding _AddRef() and _Release() manually.

查看更多
疯言疯语
3楼-- · 2019-04-28 16:57

IF you implement an interface in a form, it can be worth adding your own

_Release as follows:

    function _Release: Integer; stdcall;

function TMyInterfacedForm._Release: Integer;
begin
  result:=-1; 
end;

I found that it was possible to free a form with an interface, and then have the _Release called as the local variable went out of scope. This could produce an access violation, as the Tcomponent implementation checks to see if FVCLComObject is set

  if FVCLComObject = nil then
    Result := -1   // -1 indicates no reference counting is taking place
  else
    Result := IVCLComObject(FVCLComObject)._Release;

Since at this stage, FVCLComobject is undefined, an annoying A/V exception can occur. By hardwiring the -1, it can be called safely without trigger exceptions.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答