I'm working on some bare-metal embedded code that runs on ARM, and thus has to deal with the whole ARM vs. THUMB mode distinction. The current build system uses static pattern rules to determine whether to compile files in ARM or THUMB mode.
$(ACOBJS) : %.o : %.c
@echo
$(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $(AOPT) -I . $(IINCDIR) $< -o $@
$(TCOBJS) : %.o : %.c
@echo
$(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $(TOPT) -I . $(IINCDIR) $< -o $@
Where ACOBJS is a list of output objects that should be in ARM mode and the same for TCOBJS and Thumb mode. These lists are created from the list of sources in the usual manner of
ACOBJS = $(ACSRC:.c=.o)
TCOBJS = $(TCSRC:.c=.o)
Currently this results in the object files from the build being strewn about the source tree, which I don't particularly desire. I've been trying to set this up for out of tree builds but haven't been able to get this to work. I don't necessarily need to get full out of tree builds working, but I would like to at least be able to use an output directory under which all the intermediate files end up going. What is the best strategy to achieve this under these constraints?
One option I'm considering is using either automake or the whole autotools toolchain to build a makefile. This would seem to support creating the type of makefile I want, but seems like overkill. It also seems like there would be an inherent impedance mismatch between autotools, which is designed for portable builds, and bare-metal embedded systems, where things like host tuple are dictated by the target micro.
This is a bit old but I was just trying to do the same thing this was the first google hit. I thought it was worth sharing another approach since neither answer is convenient if you're not using autotools and want to be able to build in any directory with a single command and later just blow away that directory.
Here's an example of a Makefile that refers to files relative to the directory containing the Makefile.
Then to do an sort of source build:
On
automake
If you use
automake
, you're pretty much using the entire autotools.automake
cannot work withoutautoconf
.The
Makefile
s generated byautomake
support out-of-source builds and cross-compilation, so you should be able to create subdirectoriesarm/
andthumb/
and run../configure --host=arm-host-prefix
inarm/
and run../configure --host=thumb-host-prefix
inthumb/
. (I don't know the actual host tuples that you'd use for each compiler.)Using GNU
make
Since you're using GNUMake, you could do something like this:
Use something like this answer to ensure that the
arm/
andthumb/
directories (and any subdirectories) exist.Considering/assuming you don't care about portability and are using GNU make, you can use the VPATH feature:
Create a 'Makefile' in that directory with (approximately) the following contents:
Change the path_to_source variable to point to the root of your source tree.
Additionally you probably need to tweak your original Makefile to make sure that it supports the out of source build. For example, you can't reference to prerequisites from your build rules and instead must use $^ and $<. (See GNU make - Writing Recipes with Directory Search) You might also need to modify the vpath-makefile. For example: adding
CFLAGS+=-I$(path_to_source)
might be useful.Also note that if a file is in both your source and build directory, make will use the file in your build directory.