Why we need the presence of the shared library during the compile time of my executable? My reasoning is that since shared library is not included into my executable and is loaded during the runtime, it is not supposed to be needed during compile time. Or Am I missing something?
#include<stdio.h>
int addNumbers(int, int); //prototype should be enough, no?
int main(int argc, char* argv[]){
int sum = addNumbers(1,2);
printf("sum is %d\n", sum);
return 0;
}
I had the libfoo.so
in my current dir but I changed its name to libfar.so
to find that shared lib is needed at compile or it doesn't compile.
gcc -o main main.c -L. -lfoo
gives main.c:(.text+0x28): undefiend reference to 'addNumber'
I think it should be enough to only have the name of the shared library. The shared library itself is not needed since it is found in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and loaded dynamically at runtime. Is there something else needed other than the name of the shared lib?
Nothing is needed at compile time, because C has a notion of separate compilation of translation units. But once all the different sources have been compiled, it is time to link everything together. The notion of shared library is not present in the standard but is it now a common thing, so here is how a common linker proceeds:
This produces the executable file. Then at load time, the dynamic loader knows all the dynamic modules that are required and loads them in memory (if they are not already there) along with the actual executable and builds a (virtual) memory map
This command does (at least) two steps: compile
main.c
into an object file and link all resources into an executablemain
. The error you see is from the last step, the linker.The linker is responsible for generating the final executable machine code. It requires the shared object library because it needs to generate the machine code which loads it and executes any functions used in it.