{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 傲 的问题《boost lambda versus phoenix》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-620705.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
I recently started looking at boost phoenix, as replacement for lambda. Is phoenix a full replacement for lambda, or is there some lambda functionality which is not provided by phoenix? is phoenix mature? Are there any gotcha I should know about?
my primary interest are operator composition, control statements and casts are less so
Thanks
This post answers all your questions. Phoenix is very mature. Phoenix and lambda will be merged. It will be the base for future lambda implementations.