How to make class in C#, that can be cast to DateT

2019-04-20 09:39发布

How can I make class, that can be cast to DateTime. But I need to cast my class, when it packed. For example:

object date1 = new MyDateTime();
DateTime date2 = (DateTime)date1;

I need directly this working example.

I know how to do it, but my way will work without packing. I'm not sure is there way to do it.

Please, help.

PS. I need cast directly object to DateTime. So, MyDateTime have to be packed before. Explicit works well, but it doesn't help if you have packed object. And it have to cast just using ordinary casting like

(DateTime) (object) MyDateTime

4条回答
2楼-- · 2019-04-20 09:58

You could use

class MyDateTime
{
    public static explicit operator DateTime(MyDateTime dt)
    {
        return new DateTime(); // Convert dt here            
    }
}
查看更多
趁早两清
3楼-- · 2019-04-20 09:58

Instead of a direct cast, I would create an extension method that performs the required steps to complete the conversion. Some sort of conversion is necessary, because DateTime can't be inherited from, so a direct cast will be impossible.

public static class DateTimeExtensions
{
    public static MyDateTime ToMyDateTime(this DateTime dt)
    {
        //conversion logic
        return myDataTime;
    }
    public static DateTime ToDateTime(this MyDateTime mdt)
    {
        //conversion logic
        return dateTime;
    }
}

In this way, you would use the code like so:

DateTime dt = mdt.ToDateTime();

or

MyDateTime mdt = dt.ToMyDateTime();
查看更多
爷的心禁止访问
4楼-- · 2019-04-20 10:02

What you appear to be after is inheritance, being able to "store" a derived class instance in a variable of the base type like so:

Stream s = new FileStream();

The fact that it is a FileStream under the hood is not lost just because you are pointing to it with the Stream goggles on.

DateTime is a struct, and struct inheritance is not supported - so this is not possible.

An alternative is the explicit keyword for user-defined conversions (syntactically looking like casts). This allows you to at least interchange between your class and DateTime with more sugar.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xhbhezf4(v=vs.71).aspx

This could look like:

class MyDateTime
{
    private DateTime _inner;

    public static explicit operator DateTime(MyDateTime mdt)
    {
        return mdt._inner;
    }
}

You can do the same with the counterpart implicit keyword:

public static implicit operator DateTime(MyDateTime mdt)
{
    return mdt._inner;
}

That then lets you do the "casting" implicitly:

DateTime date = new MyDateTime();

Another alternative is to wrap DateTime with your own adapter class that internally uses a DateTime and then inherit from this class to create MyDateTime. Then instead of using DateTime in your code base, you use this adapter class.

I've seen similar things with SmartDateTime style classes where the DateTime has a better understanding of nulls and if it was set.

查看更多
孤傲高冷的网名
5楼-- · 2019-04-20 10:14

You'd need to write an explicit cast operator on your MyDateTime class that calls into one of the constructors on Datetime. Here's an example.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答