can we use the meta name="fb:admins"
instead of
meta property="fb:admins"
for w3c validation ??
相关问题
- facebook error invalid key hash for some devices
- LoginActivty with Firebase & Facebook authenticati
- Date with SimpleDateFormat in Java
- facebook “could not retrieve data from URL”
- RegEx Max and Min length characters for a Text Box
相关文章
- Angular Material Stepper causes mat-formfield to v
- Why doesn't Django enforce my unique_together
- Facebook login for group members
- X/Html Validator in PHP
- The method FB.api will stop working when called fr
- Using CascadeMode.StopOnFirstFailure on a validato
- DDD Domain Model Complex Validation
- Laravel validator `required` fails for empty strin
I'm answering this even though this is an old question since I think it's of value for whoever wants info on this in the future. Evan's probably right when he says it won't pass validation, but I think the answer is that you want to keep the
property=""
attribute. Taking from an old Facebook developer forum post concerning this question exactly it turns out your document should be an XHTML + RDFa document. This will validate in W3C, thanks to theDOCTYPE
declaration:You can find out more in in the W3C spec for RDFa, and in this specific example of
<meta property=""/>
.No, you'll just get this: