while working with java i was stuck in a weird situation, lets start with code first.
public static String constructMessage(final String reason, final String xId,
final String yId, final IonStruct metadataStruct) throws DataSanityException {
String message = "";
switch (reason) {
case "NOT_ACTIVE":
if (xId != null) {
message = String.format("Y %s X %s not active: status is inactive%n", yId, xId);
} else {
message = String.format("Y %s not active: status is inactive%n", yId);
}
break;
case "PRICE_GONE":
if (metadataStruct.containsKey("applied")) {
final String applied = metadataStruct.get("applied");
if (applied.equals("single")) {
message = String.format("X %s is not active. price for the X is gone. "
+ "Y price %s for an X should not be gone by %s.%n", xId,
metadataStruct.get("yPrice"), metadataStruct.get("zPrice"));
} else {
if (metadataStruct.get("gonePeriod").equals("gonegone")) {
message = String.format("Y price is %s whereas the gone price is %s."
+ " Y price for an X should be at least %s%% lower than gone.%n",
metadataStruct.get(yPrice), metadataStruct.get(zPrice), metadataStruct.get("xyzPrice"));
} else {
message = String.format("Y price %s for an X should be at least %s%% lower than gone price %s in last %s days.%n",
metadataStruct.get(yPrice), metadataStruct.get("mpqPrice"), metadataStruct.get(lpzPrice),
metadataStruct.get("numberOfDays"));
}
}
} else {
message = String.format(
"X %s in Y %s is not active. is %s%%, min mpux is %s%%. ", xId,
yId, metadataStruct.get("lpux"), metadataStruct.get("mpxPrice"));
}
break;
and so on ----------- around 20 cases.
default:
message = "";
break;
}
there are 20 cases like this in the complete switch with different messages and different variables used in each of the cases. And the depth of ifs is also upto 3 in some of the switches.
So the cyclomatic complexity is coming 29(too high), so i want to refactor the code with low cyclomatic complexity and better readability.
Any Suggestion ?
With "use
enum
s instead", Kayaman means something like:and you can do
From Martin Fowler's Refactoring book
I can suggest following refactoring method: