Disable output buffering

2018-12-31 00:07发布

Is output buffering enabled by default in Python's interpreter for sys.stdout?

If the answer is positive, what are all the ways to disable it?

Suggestions so far:

  1. Use the -u command line switch
  2. Wrap sys.stdout in an object that flushes after every write
  3. Set PYTHONUNBUFFERED env var
  4. sys.stdout = os.fdopen(sys.stdout.fileno(), 'w', 0)

Is there any other way to set some global flag in sys/sys.stdout programmatically during execution?

16条回答
步步皆殇っ
2楼-- · 2018-12-31 00:31

You can also run Python with stdbuf utility:

stdbuf -oL python <script>

查看更多
倾城一夜雪
3楼-- · 2018-12-31 00:31

You can also use fcntl to change the file flags in-fly.

fl = fcntl.fcntl(fd.fileno(), fcntl.F_GETFL)
fl |= os.O_SYNC # or os.O_DSYNC (if you don't care the file timestamp updates)
fcntl.fcntl(fd.fileno(), fcntl.F_SETFL, fl)
查看更多
不流泪的眼
4楼-- · 2018-12-31 00:31

Variant that works without crashing (at least on win32; python 2.7, ipython 0.12) then called subsequently (multiple times):

def DisOutBuffering():
    if sys.stdout.name == '<stdout>':
        sys.stdout = os.fdopen(sys.stdout.fileno(), 'w', 0)

    if sys.stderr.name == '<stderr>':
        sys.stderr = os.fdopen(sys.stderr.fileno(), 'w', 0)
查看更多
美炸的是我
5楼-- · 2018-12-31 00:33

It is possible to override only write method of sys.stdout with one that calls flush. Suggested method implementation is below.

def write_flush(args, w=stdout.write):
    w(args)
    stdout.flush()

Default value of w argument will keep original write method reference. After write_flush is defined, the original write might be overridden.

stdout.write = write_flush

The code assumes that stdout is imported this way from sys import stdout.

查看更多
明月照影归
6楼-- · 2018-12-31 00:34
def disable_stdout_buffering():
    # Appending to gc.garbage is a way to stop an object from being
    # destroyed.  If the old sys.stdout is ever collected, it will
    # close() stdout, which is not good.
    gc.garbage.append(sys.stdout)
    sys.stdout = os.fdopen(sys.stdout.fileno(), 'w', 0)

# Then this will give output in the correct order:
disable_stdout_buffering()
print "hello"
subprocess.call(["echo", "bye"])

Without saving the old sys.stdout, disable_stdout_buffering() isn't idempotent, and multiple calls will result in an error like this:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "test/buffering.py", line 17, in <module>
    print "hello"
IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor
close failed: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor

Another possibility is:

def disable_stdout_buffering():
    fileno = sys.stdout.fileno()
    temp_fd = os.dup(fileno)
    sys.stdout.close()
    os.dup2(temp_fd, fileno)
    os.close(temp_fd)
    sys.stdout = os.fdopen(fileno, "w", 0)

(Appending to gc.garbage is not such a good idea because it's where unfreeable cycles get put, and you might want to check for those.)

查看更多
像晚风撩人
7楼-- · 2018-12-31 00:34

This relates to Cristóvão D. Sousa's answer, but I couldn't comment yet.

A straight-forward way of using the flush keyword argument of Python 3 in order to always have unbuffered output is:

import functools
print = functools.partial(print, flush=True)

afterwards, print will always flush the output directly (except flush=False is given).

Note, (a) that this answers the question only partially as it doesn't redirect all the output. But I guess print is the most common way for creating output to stdout/stderr in python, so these 2 lines cover probably most of the use cases.

Note (b) that it only works in the module/script where you defined it. This can be good when writing a module as it doesn't mess with the sys.stdout.

Python 2 doesn't provide the flush argument, but you could emulate a Python 3-type print function as described here https://stackoverflow.com/a/27991478/3734258 .

查看更多
登录 后发表回答