As Java 8 allows for default implementation of methods in interface called Default Methods, there seems to be a confusion between when would I use a abstract class
.
So when should interface with default methods be used and when should an abstract class be used? Are the abstract classes still useful in that scenario?
Default methods in Java interface enables interface evolution.
Given an existing interface, if you wish to add a method to it without breaking the binary compatibility with older versions of the interface, you have two options at hands: add a default or a static method. Indeed, any abstract method added to the interface would have to be impleted by the classes or interfaces implementing this interface.
A static method is unique to a class. A default method is unique to an instance of the class.
If you add a default method to an existing interface, classes and interfaces which implement this interface do not need to implement it. They can
More on the topic here.
These two are quite different:
Default methods are to add external functionality to existing classes without changing their state.
And abstract classes are a normal type of inheritance, they are normal classes which are intended to be extended.
This is being described in this article. Think about
forEach
of Collections.Remi Forax rule is You don't design with Abstract classes. You design your app with interfaces. Watever is the version of Java, whatever is the language. It is backed by the Interface segregation principle in SOLID principles.
You can later use Abstract classes to factorize code. Now with Java 8 you can do it directly in the interface. This is a facility, not more.
There are a few technical differences. Abstract classes can still do more in comparison to Java 8 interfaces:
Conceptually, main purpose of defender methods is a backward compatibility after introduction of new features (as lambda-functions) in Java 8.
There's a lot more to abstract classes than default method implementations (such as private state), but as of Java 8, whenever you have the choice of either, you should go with the defender (aka.
default
) method in the interface.The constraint on the default method is that it can be implemented only in the terms of calls to other interface methods, with no reference to a particular implementation's state. So the main use case is higher-level and convenience methods.
The good thing about this new feature is that, where before you were forced to use an abstract class for the convenience methods, thus constraining the implementor to single inheritance, now you can have a really clean design with just the interface and a minimum of implementation effort forced on the programmer.
The original motivation to introduce
default
methods to Java 8 was the desire to extend the Collections Framework interfaces with lambda-oriented methods without breaking any existing implementations. Although this is more relevant to the authors of public libraries, you may find the same feature useful in your project as well. You've got one centralized place where to add new convenience and you don't have to rely on how the rest of the type hierarchy looks.