Interface with default methods vs Abstract class i

2018-12-31 09:21发布

As Java 8 allows for default implementation of methods in interface called Default Methods, there seems to be a confusion between when would I use a abstract class.

So when should interface with default methods be used and when should an abstract class be used? Are the abstract classes still useful in that scenario?

12条回答
时光乱了年华
2楼-- · 2018-12-31 10:02

Regarding your query of

So when should interface with default methods be used and when should an abstract class be used? Are the abstract classes still useful in that scenario?

java documentation provides perfect answer.

Abstract Classes Compared to Interfaces:

Abstract classes are similar to interfaces. You cannot instantiate them, and they may contain a mix of methods declared with or without an implementation.

However, with abstract classes, you can declare fields that are not static and final, and define public, protected, and private concrete methods.

With interfaces, all fields are automatically public, static, and final, and all methods that you declare or define (as default methods) are public. In addition, you can extend only one class, whether or not it is abstract, whereas you can implement any number of interfaces.

Use cases for each of them have been explained in below SE post:

What is the difference between an interface and abstract class?

Are the abstract classes still useful in that scenario?

Yes. They are still useful. They can contain non-static, non-final methods and attributes (protected, private in addition to public), which is not possible even with Java-8 interfaces.

查看更多
泛滥B
3楼-- · 2018-12-31 10:06

Please think first of open/closed principle. The default methods in interfaces DO VIOLATE it. This is a bad feature in Java. It encourages bad design, bad architecture, low software quality. I would suggest to avoid using default methods completely.

Ask yourself a few questions: Why can't you put your methods to the abstract class? Would you need then more than one abstract class? Then think about what is your class responsible for. Are you sure all methods you are going to put to the single class really fulfill the same purpose? May be you will distinguish several purposes and will then split your class into several classes, for each purpose its own class.

查看更多
只靠听说
4楼-- · 2018-12-31 10:13

As described in this article,

Abstract classes versus interfaces in Java 8

After introducing Default Method, it seems that interfaces and abstract classes are same. However, they are still different concept in Java 8.

Abstract class can define constructor. They are more structured and can have a state associated with them. While in contrast, default method can be implemented only in the terms of invoking other interface methods, with no reference to a particular implementation's state. Hence, both use for different purposes and choosing between two really depends on the scenario context.

查看更多
看淡一切
5楼-- · 2018-12-31 10:13

Whenever we have a choice between abstract class and interface we should always (almost) prefer default (also known as defender or virtual extensions) methods.

  1. Default methods have put an end to classic pattern of interface and a companion class that implements most or all of the methods in that interface. An example is Collection and AbstractCollection. Now we should implement the methods in the interface itself to provide default functionality. The classes which implement the interface has choice to override the methods or inherit the default implementation.
  2. Another important use of default methods is interface evolution. Suppose I had a class Ball as:

    public class Ball implements Collection { ... }

Now in Java 8 a new feature streams in introduced. We can get a stream by using stream method added to the interface. If stream were not a default method all the implementations for Collection interface would have broken as they would not be implementing this new method. Adding a non-default method to an interface is not source-compatible.

But suppose we do not recompile the class and use an old jar file which contains this class Ball. The class will load fine without this missing method, instances can be created and it seems everything is working fine. BUT if program invokes stream method on instance of Ball we will get AbstractMethodError. So making method default solved both the problems.

查看更多
君临天下
6楼-- · 2018-12-31 10:14

Default methods in Java Interface are to be used more for providing dummy implementation of a function thus saving any implementing class of that interface from the pain of declaring all the abstract methods even if they want to deal with only one. Default methods in interface are thus in a way more a replacement for the concept of adapter classes.

The methods in abstract class are however supposed to give a meaningful implementation which any child class should override only if needed to override a common functionality.

查看更多
宁负流年不负卿
7楼-- · 2018-12-31 10:15

when should interface with default methods be used and when should an abstract class be used?

Backward compatibility: Imagine that your interface is implemented by hundreds of classes, modifying that interface will force all the users to implement the newly added method, even though it could be not essential for many other classes that implements your interface, Plus it allows your interface to be a functional interface

Facts & Restrictions:

1-May only be declared within an interface and not within a class or abstract class.

2-Must provide a body

3-It is not assumed to be abstract as other normal methods used in an interface.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答