Is there any good reason to use FormCollection ins

2019-01-06 11:41发布

I've inherited a code base written in ASP.Net MVC 4. Every post method takes a FormCollection. Aside from annoyance of having to access the values through quoted strings, it also leads to drawbacks such as not being able to use things like ModelState.IsValid, or [AllowHtml] attributes on my ViewModel properties. They actually did create ViewModel classes for each of their views, (though they are pretty much just direct wrappers around the actual Entity Framework Model classes), but they are only used for the GET methods.

Is there anything I'm missing about FormCollection that gives a reason why this may have actually been a good idea? It seems to only have drawbacks. I'd like to go through and "fix" it by using ViewModels instead. This would take a good bit of work because the ViewModels have properties that are interfaces and not concrete classes, which means either writing a custom binder or changing the ViewModels.

But perhaps there's something I'm missing where it makes sense to use FormCollection?

10条回答
三岁会撩人
2楼-- · 2019-01-06 12:17

There are always workarounds for getting away from a FormCollection lol.. you can have hidden fields bound to your view model variables in the form to your heart's content.

Form collections mostly emerge from the laziness of creating a view model but still end up taking time trying to get figure out how to get the values out of it in your controller :P

I think it was simply created in the very beginning of MVC as an alternative to using strongly typed views when having very simple forms - back in the days when everyone used ViewBag :) ... and once hey had it in there they couldn't just take it out as simple as that.

Maybe you can use it if you are absolutely sure your view will never have more than one form input? Probably still a bad idea though..

I cant find any recent articles talking about any advantages of form collections.. while strongly typed views are everywhere.

查看更多
疯言疯语
3楼-- · 2019-01-06 12:17

You can always add the form collection properties to your method signatures. They will automatically be populated by form values with corresponding keys.

查看更多
三岁会撩人
4楼-- · 2019-01-06 12:27

Well with Forms Collection you will find a quick way to get the values of a form. Otherwise you have to create a class that mimics the Form Fields and people are sometime lazy to create custom classes for less important/rarely used Forms.

No there is no extra benefit (in fact limited) of forms collection over a custom class as action parameters and it should be avoided whenever possible.

查看更多
Deceive 欺骗
5楼-- · 2019-01-06 12:29

Is there any good reason to use FormCollection instead of ViewModel?

No. I have following issues.

Issue - 1

In case FormCollection is being used...It will be mandatory to Type Cast the Primitive Type Values un-necessarily because while getting the entry of specific Index of the System.Collections.Specialized.NameValueCollection, value being returned is of type String. This situation will not come in case of Strongly Typed View-Models.

Issue - 2

When you submit the form and goes to Post Action Method, and View-Model as Parameter exists in the Action method, you have the provision to send back the Posted Values to you View. Otherwise, write the code again to send back via TempData/ViewData/ViewBag

enter image description here

View-Models are normal classes, created to bind data to-from Views

Issue - 3

We have Data Annotations that can be implemented in View Model or Custom Validations.

enter image description here

ASP.Net MVC simplifies model validatons using Data Annotation. Data Annotations are attributes thyat are applied over properties. We can create custom validation Attribute by inheriting the built-in Validation Attribute class.



Issue - 4

Example you have the following HTML

<input type="text" name="textBox1" value="harsha" customAttr1 = "MyValue" />

Question : How can we access the value of customAttr1 from the above eg from inside the controller

Answer : When a form get posted only the name and value of elements are posted back to the server.

Alternatives : Use a bit of jQuery to get the custom attribute values, and post that along with the form values to action method

Another option is to rather put what you got in your custom attributes in hidden controls




That's the reason, I would always prefer to use View-Models

查看更多
Juvenile、少年°
6楼-- · 2019-01-06 12:30

Ok, I see the general consensus here is that it isn't liked. To offer another perspective, I've always liked using the formcollection passed into the controller on POST actions. It offers the use of the TryUpdateModel method from the controller which will map the collection to your strongly typed class. TryUpdateModel also has overloads that allow you to white list the properties of the model that you want to allow to be updated.

if (TryUpdateModel(viewModel, new string[] { "Name" }))
{
    //Do something
}

It still allows all the model binding you want, but helps to keep anything other than the "Name" property on my viewmodel from being updated.

You can see more about the TryUpdateModel method here:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.mvc.controller.tryupdatemodel(v=vs.108).aspx

查看更多
爷的心禁止访问
7楼-- · 2019-01-06 12:32

The default model binder will do almost everything you need it to do. I resorted to the FormCollection once - only to later figure out how to bind arrays of elements into a collection on the ViewModel.

Just go ViewModel. Better all around, for every reason enumerated.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答