{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 Emotional °昔 的问题《Why is there no ISO or ECMA standardization for C#》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-566921.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
I have started learning C# and was looking for a standard specification, but found that C# versions greater than 2.0 were not standardized by ISO or ECMA (or so I gathered from Wikipedia). Is there any reason for this?
相关问题
- Sorting 3 numbers without branching [closed]
- Graphics.DrawImage() - Throws out of memory except
- Why am I getting UnauthorizedAccessException on th
- 求获取指定qq 资料的方法
- How to know full paths to DLL's from .csproj f
Because writing, reviewing, validating, publishing, processing feedback, revising, re-publishing etc complex specification documents takes significant time and effort, which is a finite resource - and the demand for an ISO / ECMA version of the specification hasn't been sufficient to prompt Microsoft into investing that time.
The non-Microsoft compiler authors (Mono etc) seem to be doing just fine without it.
Anecdotally, it also avoids the problem where 2 specifications say different conflicting things (which can happen, and has happened).