This puts both Chrome 1 and 1.5 in the top ten Chrome-using visitors to my site, and they are surrounded purely by at least double-digit versions, and mostly v32.
It also gets users of these versions above my self-imposed "1% of total" cutoff for browser support. Just barely. (Actually, it puts it at just over 2%.)
Looking at a broader range (the past year), 1.5 doesn't even show up in the top 20, but 1.0 is #12 (at .6%, well below the cutoff).
Am I to take these stats to heart and consider testing my upcoming (JQuery/JQM/Bootstrap 3 riddled) site with the first version of Chrome? I didn't even think that was possible.
Or is this some weird Analytics anomaly?
I noticed this also... I have about 1.0% on GA showing Chrome 1.5 and 100% (according to GA) is "Mobile" and 97% is "Samsung" brand. Taking a look at this page - http://www.webapps-online.com/online-tools/user-agent-strings/dv/brand125499/samsung-galaxy-note-iii - makes me wonder if GA is counting strings like
Version/1.5 Chrome/28.0.1500.94
as Chrome 1.5.My best guess would be Google Analytics just screwed up the parsing of the newer Samsung user agent strings, which (again, according to that webpage) looks to be Chrome 28. At least that's what I'm going to mark it down as.
(Sorry for the 4 month late response. Figured other people might be Googling this also.)
UPDATE: These are the entries for "Mobile Device Info" on my GA results for Chrome 1.5...
All of these show potential user agents with
Version/1.5 Chrome/28.0.1500.94
, which should be interpretted as Chrome 28, not 1.5.