Please let me know if you need more information or want me to clarify anything. I have tried a lot of different things to figure this out but haven't found a solution.
I'm relatively new to angularJS and I am trying to build an app with several layers of data. I have some basic user information stored in the scope of the body on controller PageController. I then have a settings form that loads in using $routeParams (with controller SettingsController) that includes a couple of custom directives for templating purposes. Since the directives are nested, I am using transclusion to load the second one inside of the first. This all seems to be working alright.
My problem is that I am trying to reference the field user.firstname
from within the innermost directive and want to use two-way databinding to allow changes made to the textbox to cause the value at the PageController scope to change as well. I know that a lot of these kinds of problems are caused by using primitives in ng-model, but I have tried putting everything within an extra object so that I trigger prototypal inheritance to no avail. What am I doing wrong here?
Here's a JSFiddle of my code, stripped down as much as possible to isolate the problem. In this example, if I type in the outside textbox, which is directly on the PageController scope, it will modify the inner textbox until that textbox is modified, upon which the connection is broken. This seems just like the problem of using primitives as described in other questions, but I can't figure out where the issue is here.
HTML:
<body class="event-listing" ng-app="app" ng-controller="PageController">
<div class="listing-event-wrap">
<input type="text" ng-model="user.firstname" />
<div ng-controller="SettingsController">
<section block title="{{data.updateInfo.title}}" description="{{data.updateInfo.description}}">
<div formrow label="{{data.updateInfo.labels.firstname}}" type="textInput" value="user.firstname"></div>
</section>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Angular Directives:
app.directive('formrow', function() {
return {
scope: {
label: "@label",
type: "@type",
value: "=value"
},
replace: true,
template: '<div class="form-row">' +
'<div class="form-label" data-ng-show="label">{{label}}</div>' +
'<div class="form-entry" ng-switch on="type">' +
'<input type="text" ng-model="value" data-ng-switch-when="textInput" />' +
'</div>' +
'</div>'
}
});
app.directive('block', function() {
return {
scope: {
title: "@title",
description: "@description"
},
transclude: true,
replace: true,
template: '<div class="page-block">' +
'<h2 data-ng-show="title">{{title}}</h2>' +
'<p class="form-description" data-ng-show="description">{{description}}</p>' +
'<div class="block-inside" data-ng-transclude></div>' +
'</div>'
}
});
Angular Controllers:
app.controller("PageController", function($scope) {
$scope.user = {
firstname: "John"
};
});
app.controller("SettingsController", function($scope) {
$scope.data = {
updateInfo: {
title: "Update Your Information",
description: "A description here",
labels: {
firstname: "First Name"
}
}
}
});
Since the textbox in the directive uses a primitive instead of an object for its model (
ng-model="value"
rather thanng-model="someobj.somevalue"
), its model is created only on the local scope and the parent does not have access to it.The fix is to define the directive textbox model using the dot rule as an object property:
Then pass the whole
user
object into the directive instead of just the primitive property:Here is a demo
The problem is caused by
ng-switch
, From the doc Understanding scope from git.so if you type some text in the textbox. below code will be executed for the
ng-switch
scope.$scope.value="the text you typed"
So it will not consult the prototype chain to search
value
.this will created a new property forng-switch
scope.How to testify it ?
If you change
value
to$parent.value
. everything will work fine. because in theng-switch
for the primitive type (angularjs would recognize thevalue
as primitive type if there is no dot )$parent
will refer toformrow
directive scope.Try to remove the
ng-switch
or do as the doc says. the problem will disappear.And more important, the document recommend us always use a dot
.
to refer the model when apply a bi-directional binding.If I said something wrong . Please kindly correct me and make it right .thanks.
I'm sorry for the previous code. Try this instead: http://jsfiddle.net/CxNc2/2/
Instead of passing the actual value, I'm now passing the object + a pointer to the correct value inside. I added 'refobject' here:
and I added refobj + value here: