Why grails throwing null pointer exception while a

2019-04-03 18:20发布

I have a strange problem.
I have two domain classes User and Post with fields:

class User {
  String name
  static hasMany = [posts: Post]
  static constraints = { }
}

and

class Post {
  String content
  long date = System.getTimeInMillis()
  static constraints = { }

  static belongsTo = [user: User]
  static mapping = {
    version: 'false'
  }
}

and controller code is:

class UserController {
  def addUser = {
    def user
    if (User.count() == 0) {
      user = new User()
      user.name = "Manish Zedwal"
      user.save(flush: true)
    } else {
      user = User.get(1)
    }
    println "Posts count: " + user.posts.size()
    render "post count: " + user.posts.size()
 }
}

For the first time while accessing url http://localhost:8080/test/user/addUser, it throws null pointer exception, but after this works fine.
This is the exception I am getting

2011-08-04 15:41:25,847 [http-8080-1] ERROR errors.GrailsExceptionResolver  - Exception occurred when processing request: [GET] /test/user/addUser
Stacktrace follows:
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke method size() on null object
        at test.UserController$_closure2.doCall(UserController.groovy:18)
        at test.UserController$_closure2.doCall(UserController.groovy)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636)

and for second time, it prints and renders fine like charm

Posts count: 0

In user domain class, coz of hasMany relationship for posts, posts is a list of Post objects then there shouldn't be null pointer exception on getting the size of empty list, rather it should be zero.

Any help appreciated

标签: grails gorm
2条回答
贪生不怕死
2楼-- · 2019-04-03 18:43

You can prevent this by explicitly declaring your collection property (with a value) alongside your mapping:

class User {
    String name
    Set posts = []
    static hasMany = [posts: Post]
}

You can define the collection type you need. The default is Set, but if you need to maintain order, you might consider List or SortedSet.

查看更多
趁早两清
3楼-- · 2019-04-03 18:49

When you map a collection like that, the hasMany declaration adds a field of type Set with the specified name (in this case posts) to your class. It doesn't initialize the set though, so it's initially null. When you call addToPosts it checks if it's null and creates a new empty Set if necessary, and adds the Post to the collection. But if you don't call addToPosts or explicitly initialize the set, it will be null.

When you load a User from the database, Hibernate will populate all the fields, and the collection is included in that. It creates a new Set (a modification-aware PersistentSet) that's empty, and adds instances to it if there are any. Calling save() doesn't reload the instance from the database though, so the null set will still be null.

To get the class to behave the same way when it's new and when it's persistent, you can add a field to your class Like Rob showed in his answer, initialized to an empty set (Set posts = [])

查看更多
登录 后发表回答