I want to squash several commits together in the middle of a branch without modifying the commits before and after.
I have :
A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G
| |
master dev
origin/master
I want to squash that into
A -- H -- E -- F -- G
| |
master dev
origin/master
Where H
is equivalent to B -- C -- D
. And I want to be able to specify the commit message of H
. A
is the last commit that has been pushed so all commits after that can be rewritten without messing up the server. The idea is to clean up the history before I fast forward master
.
How can I do that ?
PS: Note that in my case I actually have a lot more than 3 commits to squash in the middle, but if I can do it with 3, I should be able to do it with more.
PPS: Also, if possible, I would prefer a solution where E
, F
and G
remain untouched (mostly regarding the commit date).
You can do an interactive rebase and hand select the commits which you want to squash. This will rewrite the history of your
dev
branch, but since you have not pushed these commits, there should not be any negative aftermath from this besides what might happen on your own computer.Start with the following:
This should bring up a window showing you the following list of 7 commits, going back 6 steps from the HEAD of your
dev
branch:The first commit shown (
A
above) is the oldest and the last is the most recent. You can see that by default, the option for each commit ispick
. If you finished the rebase now, you would just be retaining each commit as it is, which is effectively a no-op. But since you want to squash certain middle commits, edit and change the list to this:Note carefully what is happening above. By typing
squash
you are telling Git to merge that commit into the one above it, which is the commit which came immediately before it. So this says to squash commitD
backwards into commitC
, and then to squashC
intoB
, leaving you with just one commit for commitsB
,C
, andD
. The other commits remain as is.Save the file (: wq on Git Bash in Windows), and the rebase is complete. Keep in mind you can get merge conflicts from this as you might expect, but there is nothing special about resolving them and you can carry on as you would with any regular rebase or merge.
If you inspect the branch after the rebase, you will notice that the
E
,F
, andG
commits now have new hashes, dates, etc. This is because these commits have actually been replaced by new commits. The reason for this is that you rewrote history, and therefore the commits in general can no longer be the same as they were previously.